"Inclusionary zoning"...sure sounds like "you must live among the niggers!" to me.
"Inclusionary zoning"...sure sounds like "you must live among the niggers!" to me.
Right. "Affordable housing" Every unit costs them a minimum of $500k to build when it should cost at the most around $100k MAX (and that is pushing it).
Archive: https://archive.today/4rlLu
From the post:
>East Palo Alto, like cities across California, has a law on the books that forces developers of new housing projects to foot the bill for the state’s shortage of affordable homes. New residential projects need to set aside a share of the units they plan to build for lower-income renters and homeowners under the terms of the city’s “inclusionary zoning” ordinance. Builders who refuse have to instead pay a fee, ranging from the tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Right. "Affordable housing" Every unit costs them a minimum of $500k to build when it should cost at the most around $100k MAX (and that is pushing it).
Archive: https://archive.today/4rlLu
From the post:
>>East Palo Alto, like cities across California, has a law on the books that forces developers of new housing projects to foot the bill for the state’s shortage of affordable homes.
New residential projects need to set aside a share of the units they plan to build for lower-income renters and homeowners under the terms of the city’s “inclusionary zoning” ordinance. Builders who refuse have to instead pay a fee, ranging from the tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
(post is archived)