WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

936

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Google is in on this. It's a double bind for non kikes. Here's why;

“These actions by Google show why a bill is necessary. It’s seriously concerning that one company can essentially cut off the free flow of information to Californians,” said Brittney Barsotti, general counsel for the California News Publishers Association.

If jewgle loses the state dictates "news" (information) based on whatever criteria they want and, thus upturning the SCOTUS case that kikebook just argued (I cant' recall if it was decided yet). If jewgle win then jewgle (the state) can ... but in a "different" but identical manner.

Both sides of this kike coin are controlled and meant to silence.

news organizations are increasingly turning to governments to enact new rules forcing the tech platforms to share some of the money they make from the web with journalism organizations.

If your website was worth going to, people would go to your website and thus you'd get those delicious click shekels you crave. Also fair use dominates the mere suggestion of this law. If it's a new item, it can be shared, period.

[–] 0 pt

I see this as: you must pay this tax. Anyone can publish "news", you must list them, plus you must pay when you do. It's a forced tax. Theft actually.

I'm no fan of jewgle but this is government overreach. Altavista started the search engine platform, jewgle took it over and now the government wants to tax search engines for publicizing news links. If this is the new model, then any content provider will start collecting “fees” for listing links.

The next battle, is how does jewgle rank these links? Every content creator will demand to be first. Or perhaps jewgle will be forced to rank new links using adversity scoring. That should be interesting. Oh, you’re a nigger owned news site with 30% of your staff LGBT, you’re on page one. Sorry, your site is white owned and you only have 5% LGBT staff, you go to the bottom.