The cost of federal lands is a pittance compared to all the other bullshit our government spends money on. If that money wasnt spent maintaining millions of acres of wildlife habitat for free recreation it would just be spent on gibs for illegals and niggers. Yes i notice how wildlife prefer edge habitat. I also notice that the usfs land around here has the best hunting around. And the subject of this thread, wilderness areas specifically, that means non motorized. No atv trails all over, retards 4 wheeling pitching beer cans, no roads. Difficult access. It keeps the rabble out and provides a low pressure sanctuary for animals. Then i can go kill them in an area they feel safe, free from fat roadhunting assholes.
The cost of federal lands is a pittance compared to all the other bullshit our government spends money on.
So because they waste money elsewhere we should turn a blind eye to massive, intentional squandering of some of our most important natural resources because you like to recreate.
I know what wilderness and roadless are. Every wilderness area will eventually burn. And when it does it will burn at a soil-damaging level well above natural fire intensity as a result of the unnaturally high fuel loading created by a century of fire suppression and half a century of failed forest management.
I also know that wilderness and roadless designations are leveraged and billed by environmental groups to lock up land right in line with the principles of the Guidestones. Yeah, the article was about expanding wilderness protection areas, which does take currently operable ground out of productive rotation.
I am not at all proposing that federal land be turned over to be developed and clear-cut. I am saying that that federal land ownership at the current scale is unconstitutional and needs to end. The citizens of the several states should be given the liberty to manage the land within their borders as they see fit without any input beyond their state's capital. Citizens should absolutely require that their state maintain ground in trust as natural spaces and undeveloped areas.
Last summer, when everyone fled the coasts to get out in the woods because of the coof, did you notice where they went? They flocked to federal ground, clogging up road systems and campsites and ignoring state or open industrial ground the next drainage over. The federal system invites out-of-state road hunters and recreators to your area and they are constantly working on promoting diversity in natural resource management and outdoor recreation, not that nigs will ever into hiking or hunting.
So whats your solution, no roadless areas? Fuck it? Develop everything? Atvs everywhere? We shouldnt have any roadless wilderness areas anywhere in the country?
I am not at all proposing that federal land be turned over to be developed and clear-cut. I am saying that that federal land ownership at the current scale is unconstitutional and needs to end. The citizens of the several states should be given the liberty to manage the land within their borders as they see fit without any input beyond their state's capital. Citizens should absolutely require that their state maintain ground in trust as natural spaces and undeveloped areas.
Advocate for what you want in your state. And let the citizens of other states do the same in their homes. We don't need leftist big daddy fed calling the shots for everyone.
(post is archived)