Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I'd rather be dead then wear that shirt or think that way.

I'd rather be dead then wear that shirt or think that way.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

These stupid bitches. It's a double homicide if you kill a pregnant woman. I can't imagine being 3 months pregnant and thinking "well this sucks let's kill it." Insanity.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Yes, she's all "but if the baby is not viable" but like that's not why the roasties want abortions.

[–] • 1 pt

Because having the baby will ruin that pussy or give her a C-section scar, and then she won't be able to be a drunken slut that gives away her beauty for free.

[–] • 1 pt

I was about to follow you but already was. Must be based.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Yeah, they always try to bring up these weird edge cases that almost never happen, like rape/incest/it would kill the mom/etc, that might persuade someone in the middle to be sympathetic, but what they're advocating for is never limited to those cases so why is it relevant when your goal is to allow it under all circumstances? It's like trying to argue for legalizing all theft because one time someone stole food to feed a starving child.

Edit: Also, I just wanted to point out that the woman's body her choice argument is a little bit disingenuous. It's almost never really about that. If it was, then why would late term abortions be an issue? Your body's pretty well gone through whatever changes are going to happen. If they were arguing in good faith (a term I usually hate) then they would concede that it's about the subsequent 18 years rather than that 9 months.

[–] • 1 pt

You notice how their arguments revolve around statistically insignificant probabilities? I say we adopt the same form of argument and invent statistically improbable scenarios and use that as justification of our position.

[–] • 1 pt

This is the most level-headed response to the racial issues I've heard in my life. Brilliant. Keep pursuing this ideology.

[–] • 1 pt

Should have told her she is free to abort black babies.

[–] • 1 pt

100% disagree. She seems like the advocate who "secretly" hates niggers. The VAST majority are like this.

[–] • 0 pt

That shirt though..

[–] • 1 pt

I mean they were 100% handed out at the event. They often are. Her views on abortion are the thing that I'm most critical of.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

If you repress behavior and thought through double speak, the truth becomes distorted and disfigured and surfaces in new ways. The left are the real racists, notice they still practice segregation, division, hate speech/rhetoric. Notice they're the first to call you names, or label you, it's just them basically calling you a nigger in their head but using another word as a surrogate.

It's better to not repress, to express yourself as you are without distortion, because then when your anger surfaces it isn't distorted, it's real and raw, and it's easier to be self aware of it and control it. It's worse to assume that aren't something because it erases any self awareness allowing these incongruent thoughts to metastasize into something grotesque and disfigured.

If a person tells you straight up "I don't like you" you know where you stand, you are aware and can plan and adjust. If someone doesn't tell you, then you'll never know and you'll keep rubbing that person the wrong way without any awareness until they blow up on you.