WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

168

concluded that “only ‘gender affirming’ information can be discussed with students, and referring to the transgender movement as a ‘trend’ was prohibited language.”

The next question will be in this jewhysteria "why can't pedophiles be teachers?"

As a result, JCEA subjected the teacher to a formal disciplinary process. The teacher said: “Mandatory ‘gender sensitivity’ training was required as well, which included gender affirming testimonials of elementary students.”

Looks like the jew county education association needs the rope

The guidelines also instruct teachers not to inform parents if a student expresses a desire to transition

They don't even hide the child abuse anymore

>concluded that “only ‘gender affirming’ information can be discussed with students, and referring to the transgender movement as a ‘trend’ was prohibited language.” The next question will be in this jewhysteria "why can't pedophiles be teachers?" >As a result, JCEA subjected the teacher to a formal disciplinary process. The teacher said: “Mandatory ‘gender sensitivity’ training was required as well, which included gender affirming testimonials of elementary students.” Looks like the jew county education association needs the rope >The guidelines also instruct teachers not to inform parents if a student expresses a desire to transition They don't even hide the child abuse anymore

(post is archived)