This article is so carefully -- and so poorly -- written, that I can't determine after reading it if this guy, Hanson, was angry at Merriam Webster for using "him" and "her" or for not using "him" and "her."
This article is so carefully -- and so poorly -- written, that I can't determine after reading it if this guy, Hanson, was angry at Merriam Webster for using "him" and "her" or for *not using* "him" and "her."
You're assuming the writer was coherent when they wrote it also.
You're assuming the writer was coherent when they wrote it also.
(post is archived)