WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

Geez, I was on a creative roll with my memes that day.

Enjoy!

And for the record, I would not ever give away my DNA, but the National Geographic one does NOT report you to be 1% negro, like all the rest, if your readings are too caucasian.

Geez, I was on a creative roll with my memes that day. Enjoy! And for the record, I would not ever give away my DNA, but the National Geographic one does NOT report you to be 1% negro, like all the rest, if your readings are too caucasian.

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts (edited )

Imagine I'm filth richy and in need of a new liver. If only there was a database with people's DNA where I could go shopping for a compatible organ...

Edit: typo

[–] 1 pt

6 histological gene markers are all that are used in liver transplant matching.

six genes, and often no sibling has the same six

its possible to match 20 , not 6, but 6 are used in the US transplant system.

A DNA analysis uses 200.000 genes and allele arrangement patterns , not 6.

f you were filthy rich you would contact an israeli DNA company and pay for a list of 20 young people in their 20s that can disappear and then you harvest their organ, eliminating ANY NEED for lifelong drugs after surgery.

[–] 2 pts

Yeah. It’s bullshit. I was like 16% Turk 2 years ago, which was a surprise, but possible since I’m partly Italian, but then all of a sudden the Turk completely disappears and they hit me with 6% Jew. These things are a fucking scam. They have documented instances of people sending in housecat DNA and it coming back with human ethnicities. A couple of the testing companies are owned by Jews. No surprise there.

[–] 1 pt

Below 10% is largely sample noise, especially for these services. Generally, for public testing, ignore anything 10% or less.

[–] 3 pts

Ignore it all. It’s a fucking scam.

[–] 1 pt

I took the Ancestry dna test, and no African dna whatsoever

[–] 2 pts

Same, 23andme says I'm 100% European. But at first it said <1% north african, and updated at some point. There was definitely some kind of scandal when they admitted to falsely labeling whites as part African. Probably why they don't do it anymore.

[–] 1 pt

Then you are not 100% northern european. They pull that evil 1% nigger shit 1% jew shit on people coming from iceland, denmark, finland, sweden, norway, netherlands, and such.

You probably are more than a few % non-northern european so they did not fuck with you, or you did it prior to 2016

[–] 0 pt

First it said 1% jew, then removed it

[–] 0 pt

Now it's over 50% Scottish/Irish Welsh, the rest is Northern italy/Scilly, and 1% ibearean peninsula

[–] 1 pt

Awhile back 4chan had a poster that claimed to be a 23 and me employee said the would insert 1% jew on almost all white people results, regardless if it were true or not.

I wondered about this. I have a friend who took 2. One said she had 1% Ashkenazi the other didn't

[–] 2 pts

Send me your dick pics and I can read your future

[–] 0 pt
[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

All whites have African ancestry. Be proud of that because it is the best in terms of genes.

[–] 4 pts

FALSE!

All whites have African ancestry

Its the other way around. Proven by FST DNA distance studies, and skeletal remains.

Whites entered africa 350,000 years ago and mated with two ape like hominids becoming negros.

Note that the "Out of Africa" theory is now UNSUPPORTED by any fossil evidence!

GREECE : New fossils suggest human ancestors evolved in Europe, not Africa :
https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/evolution-europe - https://archive.md/cjpoL

First Human Ancestor Came from Europe Not Africa, 7.2 Million-year-old Fossils Indicate :
https://www.newsweek.com/first-hominin-europe-east-africa-human-evolution-613494 - https://archive.md/FZUW0

Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find :
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/ - https://archive.md/9v2D5

Scientists Look To Europe As Evolutionary Seat : Found in Germany 20 years ago, this specimen is about 16.5 million years old:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/02/020219075535.htm - https://archive.md/gPIAN

A 210,000-year-old skull (Apidima 1) has been identified as the earliest modern human
https://phys.org/news/2019-07-oldest-africa-reset-human-migration.html - https://archive.md/s3fWo

850,000-year-old human footprints found in Norfolk
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/feb/07/oldest-human-footprints-happisburgh-norfolk

Study reveals that humans migrated from Europe to Israel 40,000 years ago [NOT from Africa]
https://m.phys.org/news/2019-11-reveals-humans-migrated-europe-levant.html - https://archive.md/OkmgF

Full shocking paper (it goes out of way to indicate Negroes are non-human) : summary meme :

https://files.catbox.moe/dn6u0z.jpg

Science quote : (even prior to recent 350,000 year discovery in DNA) :
2012 : "All the presuppositions posited in support of the Out-of-Africa hypothesis fail to hold up under simple scrutiny" :

meme from :
Re-Examining the Out-of-Africa Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids). Part 2. SNPs, Haplogroups and Haplotypes in the Y Chromosome of Chimpanzee and Humans

https://files.catbox.moe/qw59t4.jpg

paper :
https://files.catbox.moe/fsszbi.pdf

MODERN species and sub species proposed names of various Homo shit-skins (detailed but lacking DNA refs) :

https://propertarianism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/the-species-of-great-apes.pdf

Neanderthal genes (lacking only in Negros) contributes much of the known 538 genes for higher IQ.

All non-negro humans have Neanderthal genes. Between 1% and 20% of the human genome is Neanderthal, depending on region.

Only the recent Black mongrels in the last 300 years have some from their human side.

No negro skeletons in Africa older than 300 years ago have more than 0.0000% Neanderthal DNA! None.

Science has proven many times that Blacks are VERY non human

A nordic skeleton DNA from 300 years ago should have 0.0000% African associated DNA in it.

A modern northern european also is not 1% negro typically.

These Jew DNA companies are acting like kikes on purpose.

[–] 0 pt

telegraph, newsweek, the guardian

lol if you really wanted to prove a point, you wouldn't use jew-owned anti-White tabloids.

[–] 1 pt

You can use news article as starting point for finding sources. The one from guardian led me to . Telegraph and newsweek has link to .

[–] 0 pt

Mine says 1% Jew but I know it’s real cause my dad is super into family history and we knew who that Jew was. Started an elevator company or something

[–] 0 pt

That isn't true. My DNA is 100% northwestern European. And not from natgeo.

[–] 0 pt

I took one of those tests and it came back 1.5% African. I call BS, but now I can say, "Hey baby, let me SHOW you my African heritage!".

[–] 0 pt

It's for things like this that I am glad my grandfather was obsessed with our family tree back to 11 generations.