Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

https://nitter.42l.fr/MaryMargOlohan/status/1475889394871676929?t=zonfYcabTigVRHnXxJ7-Iw&s=19 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10349501/Major-porn-sites-BLOCKED-France-unless-ensure-users-18.html -> https://archive.md/kHDrD Will the US liberate France?

(post is archived)

[–] • 13 pts

All these porn websites are owned and run by jews.

Meanwhile porn is banned in Israel.

[–] • 0 pt

And it's used by them as psychological warfare against the communities in Gaza they've been pushing out. That enough should be a big enough red pill for people.

[–] • 7 pts

Don’t see a problem here, other than it’s very antisemetic

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Have you seen the nazi jew porn?

Have you seen nazi jew porn on weeeeed?!

[–] • 5 pts

When they bring in measures so people have to make accounts and verify them with a credit card or whatever, there will be a lot less people in France watching porn, which is a good thing.

[–] • 2 pts

Great idea, I guess it's been 'free' for so long, who even thinks of that now..

[–] • 5 pts

I remember when I was a kid someone played a prank on me by saying xhamster was a website about hamsters. I’m glad it’s on their ban list.

[–] • 3 pts

I am all for porn going away, but this is a way for them to make tools to change the internet.

We saw the same thing with dmca here. This is a legal tool to remove content from the internet in a western country

[–] • 1 pt

This is a legal tool to remove content from the internet in a western country

Good. Fuck porn and fuck you for supporting it because "muh speech". Porn is not protected under the first. It's clear as day. Obscene speech is not protected.

[–] • 2 pts

i am not saying muh speech, i'm saying that they are developing a technology to remove websites and a legal framework to do it.

Maybe someone could post a nude on poal and then use the france rule to have it removed from france, I don't know the wording, but once you give government a tool like this they will keep looking for "nails".

[–] • 1 pt

i'm saying that they are developing a technology to remove websites and a legal framework to do it.

They already have that capability and have since the internet gained the web and it was a thing. Do you have no idea who (((ICANN))) is? They can just take your domain. Period. And when obama gave ICANN to the (((UN)))... well.

[–] • 0 pt

Or, you could, just ban porn websites altogether?????

no?