WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

236

Technology that starts as a novel convenience soon transforms into something you’re forced to live with. There is no option to opt out of the new world order.

Technology that starts as a novel convenience soon transforms into something you’re forced to live with. There is no option to opt out of the new world order.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

That's a pretty broad statement to make based solely on what I've posted here regarding Mr. Kaczinski. For clarification, in his document, he stated that part of the reason he resorted to killing was simply to ensure that the manifesto got the attention that he thought it deserved. Yeah, it's accurate to say that I may disagree with that particular motivation, but not to say that I am willing to go along to get along where the destruction of our society, our people, and our way of life are concerned.

If we lose it will be, at least in part, that there simply are not enough of us to earn the victory. I have no love for this earthly life for a variety of reasons, but that doesn't mean I will simply throw it away to prove a point.

I am aware of everything you mention in your main paragraph, and based on my knowledge of history, I do not disagree with you. Be it in Czarist Russia, pre and post WW1 Germany, the Weimar Republic, and now here in the U.S., I know full well who the enemy is, and when and if the time comes, I will stand with those willing to lay it all on the line to resist them.

I have plenty of fight in me, at least for a semi-old guy, but I also know that one at a time, we're all easy pickins. I think you and I understand some of the same things, and that we share many of the same frustrations and concerns. I think there are many like us, but that through technology and the control exercised over us by those you mention, through the governments, the media, and through the corporations and bankers, it's become more difficult to find one another. I do wonder if these same technologies existed in decades past, would any leader have been able to rise up and challenge them as they did?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

he stated that part of the reason he resorted to killing was simply to ensure that the manifesto got the attention that he thought it deserved.

And we're here talking about it decades later. So I'd say he was right, again.

That's a pretty broad statement to make based solely on what I've posted here regarding Mr. Kaczinski.

I'm just disagreeing with the condoning of his actions. He striked back at commies that have been waging a shadow war against us for years, "death by a thousand cuts" style.

This guy saw the world for what it was back when nobody suspected a thing. He was redpilled before "redpill" was even a saying. He used his fat gigantic brain to determine exactly what will happen years into the future, and why. And he was right about almost everything.

Imagine the current situation is a mathematical equation, we're still staring at it like buffoons while Ted already finished the proof and realized that he needs to start mailing some envelopes. Ted and his work aren't something that can be dismissed via one or two sentences that people are typing here.