![Ted Kaczynski Predicted This [1200x1179 - 185KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/gZphLi.jpg){kind=link}
If you've never read his manifesto, I highly recommend it. He really understood that nothing as powerful as the tech has become could ever not be used for evil. I don't condone his killing of people the way he did it, but I could see his logic in doing so, twisted as it may have been. What he predicted in that document is unfolding right in front of us.
I don't condone his killing of people the way he did
This is why we’re going to lose. People are pussified. You have no fight in you.
Your enemy starts brother wars to kill your kind while profiting off of it. Then uses profits to imports savages to rape your women while trying to literally genocide you via race mixing. Enslaves you to debt and pushes all kinds of degeneracy like faggotry, tries to brainwash your children to hate themselves and become transsexuals, and will eventually try to normalize pedophilia so they can rape your children too.
And guy over here is like “waaaah Ted was a meanie cuz he blew commies up!!!”
Lmfao unreal.
And guy over here is like “waaaah Ted was a meanie cuz he blew commies up!!!”
That made my day.
That's a pretty broad statement to make based solely on what I've posted here regarding Mr. Kaczinski. For clarification, in his document, he stated that part of the reason he resorted to killing was simply to ensure that the manifesto got the attention that he thought it deserved. Yeah, it's accurate to say that I may disagree with that particular motivation, but not to say that I am willing to go along to get along where the destruction of our society, our people, and our way of life are concerned.
If we lose it will be, at least in part, that there simply are not enough of us to earn the victory. I have no love for this earthly life for a variety of reasons, but that doesn't mean I will simply throw it away to prove a point.
I am aware of everything you mention in your main paragraph, and based on my knowledge of history, I do not disagree with you. Be it in Czarist Russia, pre and post WW1 Germany, the Weimar Republic, and now here in the U.S., I know full well who the enemy is, and when and if the time comes, I will stand with those willing to lay it all on the line to resist them.
I have plenty of fight in me, at least for a semi-old guy, but I also know that one at a time, we're all easy pickins. I think you and I understand some of the same things, and that we share many of the same frustrations and concerns. I think there are many like us, but that through technology and the control exercised over us by those you mention, through the governments, the media, and through the corporations and bankers, it's become more difficult to find one another. I do wonder if these same technologies existed in decades past, would any leader have been able to rise up and challenge them as they did?
he stated that part of the reason he resorted to killing was simply to ensure that the manifesto got the attention that he thought it deserved.
And we're here talking about it decades later. So I'd say he was right, again.
That's a pretty broad statement to make based solely on what I've posted here regarding Mr. Kaczinski.
I'm just disagreeing with the condoning of his actions. He striked back at commies that have been waging a shadow war against us for years, "death by a thousand cuts" style.
This guy saw the world for what it was back when nobody suspected a thing. He was redpilled before "redpill" was even a saying. He used his fat gigantic brain to determine exactly what will happen years into the future, and why. And he was right about almost everything.
Imagine the current situation is a mathematical equation, we're still staring at it like buffoons while Ted already finished the proof and realized that he needs to start mailing some envelopes. Ted and his work aren't something that can be dismissed via one or two sentences that people are typing here.
Your enemy starts brother wars to kill your kind while profiting off of it. Then uses profits to imports savages to rape your women while trying to literally genocide you via race mixing. Enslaves you to debt and pushes all kinds of degeneracy like faggotry, tries to brainwash your children to hate themselves and become transsexuals, and will eventually try to normalize pedophilia so they can rape your children too.
You forgot they built camps now to send people who test positive or whatever
Yeah I just stopped adding all their offenses because the post would honestly just be too long.
Just sit down and try to think of all the ways they're attacking you and your kind and you'll be shocked how much of it is "normal" that you don't even really think about it, but once you collate it all together and are conscious about it. Well, let me know how you feel after that.
I don't condone his killing of people the way he did it, but I could see his logic in doing so, twisted as it may have been.
You think he should have done it some other way?
You don't condone logic? Now logic is twisted. How so? It wasn't twisted at all, it was linear thinking. Get rid of the enemy and your problems are solved.
Maybe if his brother wasn't a rat. He broke rule #1, never trust anyone. lol
I thought his brother just recognized his writing style or something, and suggested it to the FBI. Like the cuckold he is.
I hope when his brother dies, he realizes how badly he fucked up and that his smarter sibling was right all along.
Yep, he should have never told anyone. On one hand, I can see how using the deaths of people who were creating the very technology he was warning us about to draw attention to his cause, but I just don't see how it could have really been effective given that, at the time, the manifesto wasn't widely available. Did it work to get me to read it? Maybe, but I know from experience in talking to the average person, that I'm a bit different. Most won't read it, most wouldn't read it even if he blew up their own mothers. Another reason is that the manner in which he did it could have caused the death and injury of innocents, instead of his intended targets, and I think that alone is my biggest problem with it. If one has a beef with someone, fine, but what if a kid had found one of those packages? Sure, it would have drawn attention to what he wanted to say, but from a moral standpoint, I have issues with "the end justifies the means" point of view.
Did he actually tell his brother, or was it only after the manifesto was printed that his brother recognized the writings to be familiar with what he knew about Ted? Either way, he compromised himself, but having the mindset as a younger man to hide what he would later write as he went about doing the things he did seems almost impossible.
As for whether or not I agree with him: In some ways yes. His point about technology always ending up being used for evil was spot on, and the way he saw how computer tech would be used in the future to monitor and control us was spot on, and it's not yet near where I believe he saw it going. If the tech oligarchs get their way, this will not end well for any of us.
These communist monkey turds kill kids intentionally all the time and there's no moral handwringing there.
Not everything is to draw attention to some faggy political cause. Sometimes, it's simply to get motherfuckers who need to get got. A manifesto generally is an explanation, "why I did it". Your reading something or agreeing with it or not doesn't do dick.
Your generation doesn't seem to understand that. No offense, but your commie upbringing renders 99% of you as idiots.
Got a source for it?
Did the link come through? I've never tried to post one in a reply before. I'll try it with quotes to see if that works. "https://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~harry/ethics/Unabomber.pdf"
Awesome, thanks. That's too much to read at work, it'll have to be tonight.
I read it.
It wasn't anything special and it really had no insights of value. Mostly, it read like it was written by a child that has no understanding of how humans work, how society works and how socialization in social animals like our species works.
I also recommend that people read it, it's a valuable insight into what appears to either be a child that had autism or a smart child that got fucked by being called smart. Smart kids are usually smart in a vertical like math or science or language and everyone calls them smart all their lives so they end up believing it. Smart kids usually end in failure, Ted kind of reads like that.
Good to know random guy on the web thinks he knew better than one of the greatest minds of our generation.
I mean, good point. I do come across as a jackass. I just might be one.
I have tried to read a lot of the stuff our side either collects or writes, and a lot of it is lacking. Some have posted that he made some good points, yeah can't deny that either.
Fair point.
Lol. As an intelligent person, I can tell you that what he wrote was intelligent, and you are coping for some weird reason. Sure it wasn't mindblowing, but it was a good concise summary with an obvious analytical depth to it that most people cannot comprehend by themselves.
Wasn't he put through some MK-ULTRA type shit when he was younger?
Apparently yes.
They shipped him off to MIT by the time he was 16, put him in a special dorm, and secretly dosed him with LSD for a few years.
you might need to read it again
No, no I don't. I am in IT and I have cross domain expertice and substantial body of experience at all organizational levels including very large companies.
I can assure you, I don't need to read what that crank wrote to any degree again.
// EDIT: However, since you tangentially kinda imply some of this, I could rewrite it into something more coherent with past explanatory power and reasonable future predictive power. Mind you, rewriting his manifesto is not really a good format anyway, there are better methods and solutions that can be used to move us forward in a way that is strategically more valuable than trying to show the world how smart the author is.
I agree with some of that, but I also think that the experiments he participated in while at Harvard probably damaged him in some pretty unimaginable ways. Don't get me wrong, I think he's still responsible for what he's done, but his points about technology being used to enslave and control were, and are valid.
(post is archived)