Is that a call for violence from you?
Is that a call for violence from you?
Nope. Call for Violence isn't even close to what you are assuming it is.
In Perez v. Florida (2017), Justice Sonia Sotomayor urged the Court to re-evaluate its true threats jurisprudence in a future case with the proper procedural posture. “States must prove more than the mere utterance of threatening words – some level of intent is required,”
Additionally 3 factors (Watts factors) of the true threat doctrine EACH must be PROVEN WITH INTENT; 1 the context of the statement or statements in question; 2 the reaction of the recipient or listeners; and 3 whether the threat was conditional.
Nope.
Call for Violence isn't even close to what you are assuming it is.
>In Perez v. Florida (2017), Justice Sonia Sotomayor urged the Court to re-evaluate its true threats jurisprudence in a future case with the proper procedural posture. “States must prove more than the mere utterance of threatening words – some level of intent is required,”
Additionally 3 factors (Watts factors) of the true threat doctrine EACH must be PROVEN WITH INTENT;
1 the context of the statement or statements in question;
2 the reaction of the recipient or listeners; and
3 whether the threat was conditional.
https://archive.md/D2fGf
Figured I'd get a response with that.
Figured I'd get a response with that.
Do you know who the fuck you're talking to?
Do you know who the fuck you're talking to?
(post is archived)