Gotta love the word play right?
"Tasteful nudity" is "art" and not "sexually explicit" but instead "evocative".
Videos of people fucking is probably considered "sexually explicit" and not nudity as it captures the act of intercourse. They'll probably cut the line at ugly bitches and insertions of any kind.
The line should have been drawn at ugly bitches from the start imo.
Really they could just start charging bandwidth or storage for the images and people that aren't earning enough would leave.
They'd probably get less whores joining in the first place though. It's low investment to just take a picture with legs spread, but if they're unsure about if there will be any return on investment then there would probably be hesitancy to even pay a dollar a month.
(post is archived)