WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

589

...a population of workers who are disproportionately marginalized...

^ that right there should raise a few questions because it's somewhat true.

I would bet that a good amount of only fans paid users are 100% fake and are just a means of (((banks))) to do kikery with money.

jew banks are behind the squeeze though!!!

Eh sure? When have kikes not played both sides of every issue? The squeeze likely came from thotaudit and the likelihood of underage onlyfans accounts being found went up substantially. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm just thinking.

>...a population of workers who are disproportionately marginalized... ^ that right there should raise a few questions because it's somewhat true. I would bet that a good amount of only fans paid users are 100% fake and are just a means of (((banks))) to do kikery with money. >jew banks are behind the squeeze though!!! Eh sure? When have kikes not played both sides of every issue? The squeeze likely came from thotaudit and the likelihood of underage onlyfans accounts being found went up substantially. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm just thinking.

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] 7 pts
[–] 7 pts

I think the site is switching to non-porn because thousands women making money from their nasty snatch, entirely of their own volition, destroys the narrative that whores are majorly victims of the patriarchy and that none of them want this life. After fucking up an entire generation of low value women and making them believe they're worth something, they don't care if the site is destroyed.

[–] 6 pts

Sexually explicit content is banned but nudity is allowed?

[–] 4 pts

Gotta love the word play right?

"Tasteful nudity" is "art" and not "sexually explicit" but instead "evocative".

Videos of people fucking is probably considered "sexually explicit" and not nudity as it captures the act of intercourse. They'll probably cut the line at ugly bitches and insertions of any kind.

[–] 4 pts

The line should have been drawn at ugly bitches from the start imo.

[–] 1 pt

Really they could just start charging bandwidth or storage for the images and people that aren't earning enough would leave.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Pretty fucking funny.

I'm sure when they started the company they didn't imagine it being a pornography hub but probably something more akin to Patreon. The porn brought in a ton of money so they rode (heh) that wave to the top and now want to shift gears.

[–] 1 pt

Welcome to the internet bitches. You can be deplatformed at moment's notice. Don't quit your dayjob

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

This up and coming society is so fucked. No pun intended.

[–] 2 pts

No. It quite literally is not fucked. Which is why OF was a thing. But it is screwed.

Wait. Fuck.

[–] 1 pt

They are cutting a lot of middlekikes out of the port business. Can't have that.

Backpage is still an option. That's real work too.

[–] 0 pt

Does OnlyFans actually have anything on it other than porn? I mean, I understand why the company is doing this, but what do they have left?

[–] 0 pt

Self immolation for the platform. they should have started their own bank. Let's see who fills the void.

[–] 0 pt

Why are these whores complaining? I thought they liked getting fucked?

Wait, wait, wait...

Remember when conservatives were getting banned from social media platforms for their conservative views and the Auth-Leftists kept saying, "This is capitalism, honey. Don't like it, make your own!"

Then they did.

Then they tried to get the new services banned.

Then the conservatives adjusted and moved.

Then those new things were banned.

Etc. etc. etc. etc.

Now a ton of lefties are getting banned from OnlyFans. Lots of woke simps will lose their weemonz. The the trashy whores will have to find a real job. "This is a travesty! This is how we make money!!!"

Well, now...here's what I have to say:

"This is capitalism, honey. Don't like it, make your own!"

Load more (2 replies)