It's my brother who married in, met a Jamaican girl through a dating site. I am quite fit, and masculine, even though I am autistic, I know enough to hide parts of me that would only produce a hell of drama. A lot of what you say is true, blacks have a higher dose if estrogen that makes them more erratic and emotional, one of the reasons trannies are dangerous is bc they are mostly male minds doped up on increased levels of estrogen, giving them some feminine mental traits, not a good combination, and it requires a very high degree of self control to conquer this mental state, which most trannies don't have, since they'd not have gone for the treatment in the first place. Yes, I know the brains of trannies are different from cisgendered males in one specific part, but the rest of their brain remains very male. I don't already universal statements on any group, I make statistical ones, I stay away from anything that even sounds like a generalization and try to keep to the specific numbers of individuals with specific traits within each group. Thete are more black individuals who tend to have x characteristic, not blacks have x characteristic. Even saying something like "blacks have wide nostrils and darker skin" isn't always true, since there are black people who are born with narrower nostrils and lighter skin than even the fairest ethnicity of white people (in the first case ots chromosomal abnormalities, in the second its mutation of pigment production, both can look weird, though some can look decent, tge ones in the first category are likely to have developmental difficulties, the second category goes blind more easily than those without the mutation), there are whites naturally born with blue skin, asians born with epithelial folds, all manner of differences could exist within these groups. I say swans tend to be white, but can be black or gray as well. Then if pressed I can go into the exact numbers of black or gray swans, and circumstances that make black or gray swans. It's like the bell curves, taking black and white together and comparing them, there will be blacks who ate above most whites, and whites who are below most blacks, but more whites will be above blacks than the reverse, and the absolute tips will be a white at the highest level, and a black at the lowest level. Things are what they are, the things I'm saying is why races differ in our society and how it's not due to some institutional force, not what traits necessarily go along with being a certain race. For that I can day it's only that they identify as that race and no other, that they are identified as that race and no other by other people, and that they share some level of genetic similarity with others who also meet the same criteria, which is more than anyone who does not. i can somewhat agree with someone who looks pretty unmistakably black, but who has a greater degree of white in him, and identifies more with his white side and the white culture, and who calls himself primarily by his his white race. I might even let him into the ethnostate because his phenotypically black traits are only a few mixes away from being washed out completely. I'm very open on the subject of race, it surprises people when I'm more flexible than they are, although I'm also willing to accept more strict racial criteria, which are also scientifically justifiable systems of taxonomy and practical applications of the science of human races. I'm more interested in how the science can affect and explain things, it can explain away the claims of white priviledge, it can help to preserve and propagate human traits which we regard positively, such as intelligence, it can dona lot of things and be very useful to us. I'm.mainly interested in using science to find a way to give people the kind of future they most desire, science should not just be for satisfying the need for knowledge, but also should have applications that help us to achieve what we desire to do.