I dunno, I think every system of governance has its flaws and benefits. For example, monarchy can be awesome under a great ruler, but then you have the issue of dumb heirs ruining everything.
As for a republic where, say, only white, property-owning men of 35 years or older could vote - I imagine things could be fantastic, but perhaps not so much for younger guys without property. Still, i imagine they would want what’s best for their sons, so I doubt they’d make it hard for younger men to get property, gain wealth, etc.
We can do better: Voluntaryism. Every man is a dictator on his own property. All political association beyond that is voluntary. Nothing is so perfect that people can't be allowed to choose not to be a part of it.
If you exposed the courts, cops, lawmakers etc. to competition the corrupt ones would be weeded out very quickly.
All political association beyond that is voluntary.
Oh is it? Because you say so? lol.
Because I've got a hankering for some Lebensraum, and all your "property" is mine now because I just fucking murdered you, your family, and took what I wanted with brutality and superior violence. And there is no state(or whatever fucking adhoc state-by-any-other-name mental gymnastics "coalitions" you retards come up with) upon which property is authorized/adjudicated.
u/Broc_Liath : Kvetches from grave "BUT MUH N.A.P."!!!
Lolberts are fucking delusional.
Because I've got a hankering for some Lebensraum, and all your "property" is mine now because I just fucking murdered you, your family, and took what I wanted with brutality and superior violence.
Any political system can be conquered, especially in the imagination of it's opponents. You fantisising about conquering a voluntary political order is no more meaningful than me writing fanfiction about the fall of democracy or about overthrowing some king.
Lolberts are fucking delusional.
They're just as bad as Bolsheviks.
(post is archived)