Years ago they told us in school that there WAS Proof Three Ice ages, IN California. All before Man and Oil. The answer to any demand for MONEY, which is all this is about is, PROVE YOUR Claim, or STFU.
not directed at OP, but anyone who didn't understand this from your elementary history class: NO FUCKING SHIT
There is an emergency. Need to tax and gain more funds to create more tunnels and underground bases so the greys can continue their infiltration plan.
A historically changing climate isn't evidence that there is no climate emergency. I say that as someone who doesn't buy the socialist agenda they're trying to push with their climate alarmism, but the logical facts are what they are.
It's like someone on Friday, October 25, 1929, saying, "The stock market is not going to crash. History shows us that the market has gone up and down throughout history with up and down phases."
Let's also note that some of those geological archives of changing climate also coincide with mass extinction events.
How do we know that this "climate emergency" isn't the natural course of things and that the goverment uses it as an excuse to gain more power and drain us of our hard earned money.
Somewhat similar to how mayans/aztecs believed that by sacrificing people they would change the weather and bring about rain.
I personally believe that human carbon emissions are having a real effect, and that it's something we should address. What I also believe is that globalists/jews have seized upon this as something they can use to further their own agenda. Just because a cause is being co-opted by some jews doesn't mean it's not real. It just means the jews are fucking it up like everything they touch.
What evidence convinced you that carbon emissions are having a deleterious effect on the climate?
Consider how complicated the climate is. This is a dynamical system, cosmic in scale, with effectively an infinite amount of variables to consider. The climate has cooled and warmed in the past without any variation in CO2 concentration.
The idea that a trace increase in a trace gas in the atmosphere is "harmful" in any measurable way is ridiculous.
Fair enough, however I need to make it clear that I do know climate does change, it is the man-made aspect of it that I find a bit sketchy. Let me elaborate, carbon dioxide makes up 0.036% of the atmosphere, which is already a very small number but bear with me, of that only 3.2% is man-made, we're talking about 0.001152% of all gases in the atmosphere. Also, most of the photosyntesis happens in the oceans, if anything, we should worry a lot more about ocean polltion than air pollution, since oceans are the biggest source of oxygen. Now, I might be wrong in some way or another, so correct me if I am wrong.
(post is archived)