WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

At his international climate summit in April, President Joe Biden vowed to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. The goal will require sweeping changes in the power generation, transportation and manufacturing sectors. It will also require a lot of land.

Wind farms, solar installations and other forms of clean power tend to take up more space on a per-watt basis than their fossil-fuel-burning brethren. A 200-megawatt wind farm, for instance, might require spreading turbines over 13 square miles (36 square kilometres). A natural-gas power plant with that same generating capacity could fit onto a single city block.

Achieving Biden’s goal will require aggressively building more wind and solar farms, in many cases combined with giant batteries. To fulfill his vision of an emission-free grid by 2035, the U.S. needs to increase its carbon-free capacity by at least 150%. Expanding wind and solar by 10% annually until 2030 would require a chunk of land equal to the state of South Dakota, according to Princeton University estimates and an analysis by Bloomberg News. By 2050, when Biden wants the entire economy to be carbon free, the U.S. would need up to four additional South Dakotas to develop enough clean power to run all the electric vehicles, factories and more.

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-energy-land-use-economy/

At his international climate summit in April, President Joe Biden vowed to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. The goal will require sweeping changes in the power generation, transportation and manufacturing sectors. It will also require a lot of land. Wind farms, solar installations and other forms of clean power tend to take up more space on a per-watt basis than their fossil-fuel-burning brethren. A 200-megawatt wind farm, for instance, might require spreading turbines over 13 square miles (36 square kilometres). A natural-gas power plant with that same generating capacity could fit onto a single city block. Achieving Biden’s goal will require aggressively building more wind and solar farms, in many cases combined with giant batteries. To fulfill his vision of an emission-free grid by 2035, the U.S. needs to increase its carbon-free capacity by at least 150%. Expanding wind and solar by 10% annually until 2030 would require a chunk of land equal to the state of South Dakota, according to Princeton University estimates and an analysis by Bloomberg News. By 2050, when Biden wants the entire economy to be carbon free, the U.S. would need up to four additional South Dakotas to develop enough clean power to run all the electric vehicles, factories and more. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-energy-land-use-economy/

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Natural gas is so much more benign to the environment than wind turbines.

Yes, in soo many ways. For example, old wind turbine blades are accumulating and filling up land fills. And check this insanity

Clearing of 2000 hectares in one of the last undisturbed forests has begun as State of Hesse issues the construction approval for massive industrial wind park. The Reinhardswald is known as the “treasure house of European forests” or the “Grimm’s fairy tale forest”.

A total of about 2000 hectares ( 20 million m²) of the thousand-year-old Reinhardswald was designated for destruction by the state in order to clear the way for a massive wind power plant development.

If this doesn't piss you off, nothing will. The inmates are in total control of the asylum now. Soo sad.

[–] 1 pt

Natural gas wells are small wellheads on a pipeline. Insignificant.

Coal mines can be large individually, but mining in general occupies a tiny amount of land in the grand scheme of things.

Many of us have never noticed a coal mine or natural gas well, but we have all seen the ugly windmill farms.

This is truth.

Roger that. I suspect the clearing of the worlds forests, to make room for wind farms, has more to do with the war on civilization by the elites than it does in 'clean energy'.

https://pic8.co/sh/NUBxsp.jpg

[–] 1 pt

"Renewable" energy is dogshit across the board. Inefficient, highly polluting, lots of waste etc. The only real exception being geothermal.

We need more nuclear plants.

Copy that pal. And there's even a cleaner, more abundant source of nuclear power that's available with .

[–] 1 pt

It's a travesty that China will beat the West to a modern thorium reactor.

Our government has been hijacked by satanic socialist traitors. Until there's a purge of our whole government, our once beautiful republic is doomed.