Now show us ehat happens if you remove all the CO2 like the greentards want.
Ill give you a hint.
Everything dies.
Now show us ehat happens if you *remove* all the CO2 like the greentards want.
Ill give you a hint.
Everything dies.
There are two sides to the carbon dioxide issue.
On the one hand, it is harmless. It is not causing global temperatures to rise. Computer models do not correspond with real-world conditions.
On the other hand, we need much more of it in our air. The extra carbon dioxide being emitted by the coal-fired electrical plants in China and India is causing world food crops to have greater harvest yields.
You seldom hear scientists advocating more CO2 production, because the brainless propaganda put out by the left is so ubiquitous. But they should be doing so. More CO2 emissions equals larger, more hardy crops. This is not speculation, this is statistical fact.
There are two sides to the carbon dioxide issue.
On the one hand, it is harmless. It is not causing global temperatures to rise. Computer models do not correspond with real-world conditions.
On the other hand, we need *much more of it* in our air. The extra carbon dioxide being emitted by the coal-fired electrical plants in China and India is causing world food crops to have greater harvest yields.
You seldom hear scientists advocating more CO2 production, because the brainless propaganda put out by the left is so ubiquitous. But they should be doing so. More CO2 emissions equals larger, more hardy crops. This is not speculation, this is statistical fact.
https://principia-scientific.com/why-more-atmospheric-co2-is-a-good-thing/
Plants absorb atmospheric CO2 through small portals called stoma. The more CO2 there is in the atmosphere the fewer stomata a plant needs. And since these stomata are the point of primary moisture loss plants are becoming heartier and better able to survive dry climates. As we sit here the edges of arid areas are seeing a creeping intrusion of foliage.
Plants absorb atmospheric CO2 through small portals called stoma. The more CO2 there is in the atmosphere the fewer stomata a plant needs. And since these stomata are the point of primary moisture loss plants are becoming heartier and better able to survive dry climates. As we sit here the edges of arid areas are seeing a creeping intrusion of foliage.
Almost every single documentary you will ever see about deep time accidentally details it.
Almost every single documentary you will ever see about deep time accidentally details it.
Increased levels of carbon dioxide do, indeed, cause global warming. However, the establishment would have you believe that this is a bad thing. In fact, releasing huge amounts carbon dioxide into the atmosphere could very well lead to a fountain of youth. Let me explain…
There is evidence of megaflora and megafauna that existed on this planet long ago. What sort of atmospheric conditions led to this development? I would argue a dense atmosphere with high levels of CO2 and O2. The first few generations of the patriarchs in the Bible lived to be almost 1000 years old. Fact or fantasy? What if the atmosphere back then was akin to a hyperbaric chamber? We already know the incredible healing benefits of increased oxygen levels under greater-than-normal atmospheric pressures.
My argument is that prior to the great flood, the axial tilt of the earth was essentially zero, leading to a dense atmosphere and an environment that was favorable to life on earth. It wasn’t until after the flood - possibly a near miss from Nibiru/Planet X - that the axis of the earth shifted, leading to the four seasons that we now experience. Coincidentally, this is also when the lifespan of mankind (according to the Bible) began to significantly decrease.
Just a creationist-tard’s two cent’s worth…
Increased levels of carbon dioxide do, indeed, cause global warming. However, the establishment would have you believe that this is a bad thing. In fact, releasing huge amounts carbon dioxide into the atmosphere could very well lead to a fountain of youth. Let me explain…
There is evidence of megaflora and megafauna that existed on this planet long ago. What sort of atmospheric conditions led to this development? I would argue a dense atmosphere with high levels of CO2 and O2. The first few generations of the patriarchs in the Bible lived to be almost 1000 years old. Fact or fantasy? What if the atmosphere back then was akin to a hyperbaric chamber? We already know the incredible healing benefits of increased oxygen levels under greater-than-normal atmospheric pressures.
My argument is that prior to the great flood, the axial tilt of the earth was essentially zero, leading to a dense atmosphere and an environment that was favorable to life on earth. It wasn’t until after the flood - possibly a near miss from Nibiru/Planet X - that the axis of the earth shifted, leading to the four seasons that we now experience. Coincidentally, this is also when the lifespan of mankind (according to the Bible) began to significantly decrease.
Just a creationist-tard’s two cent’s worth…
We'll be burning immune deficient bodies to keep us warm if we don't get producing more damn carbon.
We'll be burning immune deficient bodies to keep us warm if we don't get producing more damn carbon.
(post is archived)