WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

re "You think Jesus understood what he was talking about 2,000 years ago?" Yes. Jesus is the Second Person of the Trinity.

Remember, Heiser's fallible interpretations are not a part of Scripture.
John 10:34 is the climax of Jesus’ defense before the hostile Jewish leaders who had accused Him of blasphemy for claiming to be the Son of God. In this verse He quotes Psalm 82 6 — “You are gods” — to show that Scripture itself uses the word gods for human beings who exercise divine authority, and therefore His own claim to be “the Son of God” is not a violation of the law.

There is no plurality of created little 'g' gods as per Heiser's fallible interpretations.

[–] 0 pt

Are you even reading these answers? I’ll try again:

34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? 35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;

John 10 KJV

That is Jesus Christ talking.

[–] 0 pt

Did you even read? “You are gods” — to show that Scripture itself uses the word gods for human beings who exercise divine authority, Therefore there are no little 'g' divine creature gods. Heiser and his fallible interpretations are wrong.

[–] 0 pt

Haven’t you heard?

You never go full retard.