Why did you down-vote this? @level_101 I don't mean that in a snotty way - I'd just like to know why. I 100% believe that the report is true - but I also believe that, given the groups invoIved, there's an underlying agenda to use child trafficking to usher in digital ID, as explained here: Why is the WSJ, clearly in lib-camp, so concerned all of a sudden about online child safety? Here's why: 1) Pushing for implementation of digital ID and more online "trust" (i.e. censorship) under the guise of stopping online child trafficking 2) Distracting us from all the other crap going on So, who are the groups doing so much to protect our children? 1) The Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO). Yes, that's right - the same group that coordinated with Twitter to censor election information - so that Pedo Joe would be (s)elected. https://www.eipartnership.net/blog/about-eip-2022 SIO is also the group behind censoring covid "disinformation." People like Alex Stamos https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/people/alex-stamos and Renee DiResta, the queen of disinformation, https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/people/renee-diresta The same group that publishes the Journal of Online Trust and Safety which is funded by PO (as are the above individuals and their connected NGO's election disinformation projects): https://tsjournal.org/index.php/jots/about Yes, the same PO who transports little-boy-tongue-sucker Dalai Lama on his private jet https://pic8.co/sh/hMnem9.png , hosts the Dalai Lama at his home https://www.dalailama.com/news/2012/dalai-lama-arrives-on-oahu-brings-laughter-to-welcoming-ceremony, supports the Dalai Lama Center https://dalailamacenter.org/about/people/pierre-omidyar and the Dalai-connected SEE Learning Center at Emory: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/dalai-lama-to-launch-emory-universitys-see-learning-program-in-new-delhi/articleshow/68727865.cms The same PO who funded MIT Media Lab - the same MIT Media Lab from which PO's long-time confidante, Joi Ito, was forced to resign when Jeffrey Epstein's donations became public knowledge. The same PO who, along with Gates, is the biggest money behind getting digital ID implemented: https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Digital-ID-–-A-Key-to-Inclusive-Growth-.pdf 2) UMass Rescue Lab - whose director, Brian Lynn, works closely with the censorship networks and receives funding from the DOJ for his child protective work. And we know how dedicated the DOJ is to stopping child trafficking. Right. Lynn's also an author at Lawfare - another PO-funded publication known for its Never-Trump stance with a masthead of some of the dirtiest players in the business, including Mary McCord, Jim Baker, Benjamin Wittes (Brookings) and Eric Ciaramella: https://www.lawfareblog.com/masthead So, I'll ask again - What's really going on? IMO, they'll use"protecting children" to rationalize digital ID.