Time to burn down that building. Cleanse with fire!
Time to burn down that building. Cleanse with fire!
Nope and nope. Boycott.
Nope and nope.
Boycott.
I'm already boycotting that demonic business.
I'm already boycotting that demonic business.
They HAVE to get digital ID implemented to further the reset and control. I believe that's why the WSJ published that article about children being trafficked on Instagram. They'll use protecting children to fuel a digital ID. https://poal.co/s/QStorm/642656
They HAVE to get digital ID implemented to further the reset and control. I believe that's why the WSJ published that article about children being trafficked on Instagram. They'll use protecting children to fuel a digital ID. https://poal.co/s/QStorm/642656
Why did you down-vote this?
I don't mean that in a snotty way - I'd just like to know why. I 100% believe that the report is true - but I also believe that, given the groups invoIved, there's an underlying agenda to use child trafficking to usher in digital ID, as explained here:
Why is the WSJ, clearly in lib-camp, so concerned all of a sudden about online child safety?
Here's why:
1) Pushing for implementation of digital ID and more online "trust" (i.e. censorship) under the guise of stopping online child trafficking
2) Distracting us from all the other crap going on
So, who are the groups doing so much to protect our children?
1) The Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO). Yes, that's right - the same group that coordinated with Twitter to censor election information - so that Pedo Joe would be (s)elected. https://www.eipartnership.net/blog/about-eip-2022
SIO is also the group behind censoring covid "disinformation."
People like Alex Stamos https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/people/alex-stamos and Renee DiResta, the queen of disinformation, https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/people/renee-diresta
The same group that publishes the Journal of Online Trust and Safety which is funded by PO (as are the above individuals and their connected NGO's election disinformation projects): https://tsjournal.org/index.php/jots/about
Yes, the same PO who transports little-boy-tongue-sucker Dalai Lama on his private jet https://pic8.co/sh/hMnem9.png , hosts the Dalai Lama at his home https://www.dalailama.com/news/2012/dalai-lama-arrives-on-oahu-brings-laughter-to-welcoming-ceremony, supports the Dalai Lama Center https://dalailamacenter.org/about/people/pierre-omidyar and the Dalai-connected SEE Learning Center at Emory: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/dalai-lama-to-launch-emory-universitys-see-learning-program-in-new-delhi/articleshow/68727865.cms
The same PO who funded MIT Media Lab - the same MIT Media Lab from which PO's long-time confidante, Joi Ito, was forced to resign when Jeffrey Epstein's donations became public knowledge.
The same PO who, along with Gates, is the biggest money behind getting digital ID implemented: https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Digital-ID-–-A-Key-to-Inclusive-Growth-.pdf
2) UMass Rescue Lab - whose director, Brian Lynn, works closely with the censorship networks and receives funding from the DOJ for his child protective work. And we know how dedicated the DOJ is to stopping child trafficking. Right. Lynn's also an author at Lawfare - another PO-funded publication known for its Never-Trump stance with a masthead of some of the dirtiest players in the business, including Mary McCord, Jim Baker, Benjamin Wittes (Brookings) and Eric Ciaramella: https://www.lawfareblog.com/masthead
So, I'll ask again - What's really going on? IMO, they'll use"protecting children" to rationalize digital ID.
Why did you down-vote this? @level_101
I don't mean that in a snotty way - I'd just like to know why. I 100% believe that the report is true - but I also believe that, given the groups invoIved, there's an underlying agenda to use child trafficking to usher in digital ID, as explained here:
Why is the WSJ, clearly in lib-camp, so concerned all of a sudden about online child safety?
Here's why:
1) Pushing for implementation of digital ID and more online "trust" (i.e. censorship) under the guise of stopping online child trafficking
2) Distracting us from all the other crap going on
So, who are the groups doing so much to protect our children?
1) The Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO). Yes, that's right - the same group that coordinated with Twitter to censor election information - so that Pedo Joe would be (s)elected. https://www.eipartnership.net/blog/about-eip-2022
SIO is also the group behind censoring covid "disinformation."
People like Alex Stamos https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/people/alex-stamos and Renee DiResta, the queen of disinformation, https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/people/renee-diresta
The same group that publishes the Journal of Online Trust and Safety which is funded by PO (as are the above individuals and their connected NGO's election disinformation projects): https://tsjournal.org/index.php/jots/about
Yes, the same PO who transports little-boy-tongue-sucker Dalai Lama on his private jet https://pic8.co/sh/hMnem9.png , hosts the Dalai Lama at his home https://www.dalailama.com/news/2012/dalai-lama-arrives-on-oahu-brings-laughter-to-welcoming-ceremony, supports the Dalai Lama Center https://dalailamacenter.org/about/people/pierre-omidyar and the Dalai-connected SEE Learning Center at Emory: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/dalai-lama-to-launch-emory-universitys-see-learning-program-in-new-delhi/articleshow/68727865.cms
The same PO who funded MIT Media Lab - the same MIT Media Lab from which PO's long-time confidante, Joi Ito, was forced to resign when Jeffrey Epstein's donations became public knowledge.
The same PO who, along with Gates, is the biggest money behind getting digital ID implemented: https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Digital-ID-–-A-Key-to-Inclusive-Growth-.pdf
2) UMass Rescue Lab - whose director, Brian Lynn, works closely with the censorship networks and receives funding from the DOJ for his child protective work. And we know how dedicated the DOJ is to stopping child trafficking. Right. Lynn's also an author at Lawfare - another PO-funded publication known for its Never-Trump stance with a masthead of some of the dirtiest players in the business, including Mary McCord, Jim Baker, Benjamin Wittes (Brookings) and Eric Ciaramella: https://www.lawfareblog.com/masthead
So, I'll ask again - What's really going on? IMO, they'll use"protecting children" to rationalize digital ID.
bad click on mobile, tried to un-downvote it but that dosn't always work.
bad click on mobile, tried to un-downvote it but that dosn't always work.
Thank you for explaining - It didn't make sense given your other comments, and I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. All good.
Thank you for explaining - It didn't make sense given your other comments, and I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. All good.
Gets me all the time too.
Gets me all the time too.
This example is bad enough - but it will soon happen for more than noncompliance with digital passports. It will be used to determine what we can buy based on our social credit and wellness scores. They are already using wearables in the UK to monitor health. It's currently voluntary, rewarding those with good health behavior. However, as we know, voluntary tends to become mandatory with the cabal.
This example is bad enough - but it will soon happen for more than noncompliance with digital passports. It will be used to determine what we can buy based on our social credit and wellness scores. They are already using wearables in the UK to monitor health. It's currently voluntary, rewarding those with good health behavior. However, as we know, voluntary tends to become mandatory with the cabal.
Some companies in the US are doing this too. It's voluntary as well but they will give you $$ or a break on insurance premiums if you sign up and wear a tracker that reports your info to their servers.
Some companies in the US are doing this too. It's voluntary as well but they will give you $$ or a break on insurance premiums if you sign up and wear a tracker that reports your info to their servers.
Yep -boiling frogs.
Yep -boiling frogs.
I started to like Aldis but another one bites the dust.
I started to like Aldis but another one bites the dust.
I agree with the issue, there must NOT be ANY "scanning" to buy food (or anything)
What I wish to say is that it is not probably the greenpass that is used in europe butpossibly some aldi scheme
still totally BAD
I agree with the issue, there must NOT be ANY "scanning" to buy food (or anything)
What I wish to say is that it is not probably the greenpass that is used in europe butpossibly some aldi scheme
still totally BAD
might interest you - https://digitalpublicgoods.net/blog/omidyar-network-joins-as-a-member-of-the-dpga/
might interest you - https://digitalpublicgoods.net/blog/omidyar-network-joins-as-a-member-of-the-dpga/
(post is archived)