“She did send out a message,” Dunham recalled, “saying, ‘you should be in pajamas, be in your uniform, have fun with it.’ But, it didn’t sit right.”
I think this is overblown. From what the story states nowhere does it say anything inappropriate about it and further instructions specifically state to do so in clothing.
Dunham said she spoke with other parents about the request and was met with the same solution: “’Just cover your child up with something.’”
See. This is overblown. I don't get it at all.
The Dunham’s daughter was expelled.
School are dumb niggers too. Just as much as the parents.
I'm guessing this wasn't the first issue the parent, child, and school had with each other. And I had the same conclusion. The title tries to paint a negative picture, but the actions and comments of the school and other parents seem to say otherwise.
The title is ridiculous clickbait and OP should be ashamed as fuck.
"We do not condone taking pictures in the bathroom."
I think it's reasonable to refuse on those grounds.
And I think you're being unreasonable to think taking pictures in the bathroom is necessarily an affront to normalcy where pictures in the dining room or living room wouldn't be. The context of said picture dictates that. The context of this picture was very specifically laid out and for some reason people got upset about it. Those people are far more wrong than the school's expulsion. To be frank, I wouldn't want to deal with a pair of parents who argued over something so insanely clear for a further many years.
An adult can judge that, but a child will not have such a clear idea. I think that was the point of the no-bathroom-pictures rule of these parents.
(post is archived)