The term is a jew deception.
The Apostle Paul repented of his Judaism and went on to call out the “Judaizers.” The Apostle John openly referred to them as the “Synagogue of Satan.”
The term is a jew deception.
The Apostle Paul repented of his Judaism and went on to call out the “Judaizers.” The Apostle John openly referred to them as the “Synagogue of Satan.”
Jesus was a heeb. He rejected AND based his teaching around their ideas.
Jesus was their God manifest in the flesh. He wrote their law in the first place, and that is why he was able to teach the law with authority.
What Jesus rejected was the fact that the religious class had taken the commandments of God and had turned them into the commandments of men.
not so much, never did the jews say 'forgive everyone' and 'feed the poor', not to mention the whole child abuse thing and millstones.
Not what I'm trying to say. Just answering the question in its most basic terms.
Jesus did a bunch of Mescaline with some Arabs and Hindus, went to study martial arts with them. He maybe was a Heeb, he may have been a Guido motherfucker with slick back hair.
He had no human dad. How do you know Mary was not an Aaryan sex trafficked to Israel by the heebs.
I think a Nazerine, but close by geographically.
Jews are not Hebrews. Jews are not Judahites. But keep proving how you swallow all of their deceptions without question.
Jesus.
Settle down, Francis.
Judeo-Christian is a bullshit term. Euro-Christian is more accurate. Europe is where Christianity took root, flowered and stemmed. The New Testament was conceived and penned in Koine Greek, not Hebrew, not Aramaic. The jews have historically and continually rejected Christ just as they subvert and feed upon Christian hosts and nations. Our distant and recent ancestors understood this. It was not until post WW ll that the hard edged propaganda kicked into overdrive and the Christian Zionist movement infected the various denominations of Western churches. Fuck, even The Catholics cucked. It was then this neologism "Judeo-Christian" was injected into the societal lexicon and consciousness.
Exactly, just another lie to keep us down. Ignore the old testament lies and just study what Jesus and John were teaching as the doctrine. Skip all that catholic bullshit too. I'll attempt to find a link to a pdf of Christian teachings and removal of the old testament.
there is no such thing as 'judeo-christian'
if youre a christian youre a christian. if you claiming to be christian but call yourself a jew, youre not a christian.
judeo-christian is satanic/atheist buzzwords that fail to shame anyone into anything.
They were Kenites,fake Jews, decendents of Cain, the 1st murderer. Jesus called them out a few times.
Technically jews killed a jew.
Not to take any sides as being “pro-Jew” or “anti-Christian”..I love Jesus.
To my knowledge, the phrase “Judeo Christian” is not and never has been an adjective used to describe a particular people.
In 4 decades on this planet, I’ve only ever heard it used to describe American moral culture and/or the genesis of American government.
I have always taken it to mean that our moral culture and original intended government function on basis of and are/were inspired by the God of the Bible and his Ten Commandments.
I really don’t believe it’s supposed to mean anything more or anything less than that.
Whatever your feelings about Jews or Christians, most people would seem to agree that the principles stated in the ten commandments are just and fair, and probably good to live by.
The founders apparently believed in the God of the Bible specifically and every single thing that they called a “right” was something that they believed was already given to every human by God in the first place. At the time, it was a revolutionary idea because no other government on the planet saw things that way, even those professing to be “Christian governments”, like the British monarchy.
The first books of the Old Testament were written by Moses, a Jew. Whether anyone likes it or not. The Ten Commandments started with him. Hence “JUDEO Christian.”
I would also argue that Moses was very clearly of a different spiritual makeup and mindset than many/most of those proclaiming to be “Jews” in this day and age.
Jesus was a Jew that's why. Do you honestly think he was a white european? The region for the setting of the Script-ure is Palestine. The New Testament follows the Old Testament which includes the Pentateuch a Jewish Canon Text. The Jews have perverted everything else, why not your religion? Christianity was set up as a false enemy to Judaism, hence why every church always folds to the Judeo state.
It started to become a thing around the 12th century IMO https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/banking-and-bankers
THE MONEYLENDERS IN EUROPE After the First Crusade (1096) the Jewish merchant, in his necessarily long journeys, no longer enjoyed even minimal physical security. In Western and Central Europe, especially in *Spain , the crystallization of the essentially Christian nature of the rising city communes combined with this insecurity to drive out the Jews from commerce and prohibit them from engaging in crafts. In France, England (up to 1290), Germany, Austria, Bohemia, Moravia, and northern and central Italy, Jews had to turn to loan-banking on a larger or smaller scale in order to make a living. The canonical prohibition against taking interest by Christians, which was stressed in successive *Church councils (especially the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215), and the vast opportunities for capital investment in land and sea trade open to the wealthy Christian made lending on interest for consumer and emergency needs virtually a Jewish monopoly in Western and Central Europe between the 12th and 15th centuries. By the 13th century the notion that the Wucherer ("usurer") was a Jew was already current, for example, in the writings of *Berthold of Regensburg , Walther von der Vogelweide, and Ulrich von Lichtenstein. The word judaizare became identical with "taking interest." Testimony from the 12th century shows that moneylending was then becoming the main occupation of the Jews; this was the case of those of Bacharach (1146) and of Muenzenberg (1188). However, there is little data to suggest that Jewish banking transactions were on a large scale even in the 13th century, but there is evidence that the bishop of Basle had debts with Basle Jews and that various monasteries had Jewish creditors.
The transition from a natural economy to a money economy in the course of the "commercial revolution," and the stabilization of territorial principalities opened new possibilities for Jewish banking activity, especially in the Rhineland and in southern Germany. Jews from Siegburg, Trier, Mainz, Speyer, Strasbourg, and Basle as well as from Ulm and Nuremberg appear as sources of credit. The most important banking transaction in the first half of the 14th century went through the hands of Vivelin the Red, who transmitted 61,000 florins in gold which King Edward III of England paid to Baldwin of Trier for becoming allied with him against France. Margrave Rudolf III of Baden was indebted to David the Elder, called Watch, and to Jekelin of Strasbourg and his partners. Muskin and Jacob Daniels served the archbishop of Trier in the administration of his finances; during the first half of the 14th century, Daniels was probably the most important Jewish banker of the Rhineland. He was followed in the service of the archbishop by his son-in-law Michael. At the same time Abraham von Kreuznach at Bingen had a similar position with the archbishop of Mainz. Gottschalk von Recklinghausen and his company was another group on the lower Rhine. Such banking activity is recorded in other parts of Central Europe as far as Silesia.
Moneychanging and coinage privileges were often combined with moneylending, and Jews were frequently the sole agents arranging loans. From the first half of the 12th century moneychanging as a special form of banking is supported by documentary evidence. To spread the risk, partnerships of between two and ten persons were formed. As security, custom at first recognized mainly pledges, but from the middle of the 13th century the letter of credit came into use, though princess till preferred to pledge jewels. Often, instead of a pawn, bail was given by several persons. In western Germany hypothecation of real estate was preferred, and in this way Jews acquired in pledge houses, vineyards, farms, villages, castles, towns, and even seigneuries. Interest rates do not seem to have exceeded 36% but in the case of deferred payment they could rise to 100% or beyond. From the 12th century popes and princes exploited the financial capacity of the Jews by frequent remission of debts or forced loans. The *Black Death and consequent persecutions of Jews gave rulers an opportunity forcibly to seize property and to restore pawns and letters of credit to debtors. The liquidation of Jewish debts by King *Wenceslaus IV of Bohemia around the end of the 14th century is a well-known example of such royal rapacity. With these and other measures and the rise of the merchant class, who gradually took over the function of loan-bankers to the princes and even to emperors during the 15th and early 16th centuries, the Jews were deprived of imperial protection and forced to leave the towns. They retired to the small seigneuries or migrated to Eastern Europe, where a less-developed economy offered them possibilities of making a livelihood. In Bohemia, Hungary, and in Poland and Lithuania both princes and nobility made use of their financial help. As the Eastern European kingdoms developed with the colonization of the forests, Jews played an increasing part in commerce and especially in the *arenda . In the larger towns some engaged in moneylending and banking activities.
In 12th-century France moneylending was an important Jewish business, but in the 13th century Jewish lenders came up against the superior competition of the Lombards, a rivalry even more intense in the Netherlands. In England, where *Aaron of Lincoln and *Aaron of York were powerful bankers, a special *Exchequer of the Jews was set up to centralize Jewish transactions. However in the 13th century the crown began to rely on the greater resources of the Cahorsins and Italian bankers and in 1290 the Jews were expelled. In Italy Jewish bankers could expand their sphere of activity under the silent protection of the popes, despite resistance on the part of the Christian burghers (see *Popes and the Jews). From the second half of the 13th century they spread throughout central Italy and gradually expanded toward the north, migrating at first to the smaller and medium-sized towns. In Pisa and then in Florence the Da *Pisa family became important loan-bankers; in Florence in 1437 Cosimo de' Medici permitted a Jewish group to establish four loan-banks; in Venice in 1366 Jews, probably of German origin, obtained the right to lend on pledges. Here as in other places in northern Italy, Jewish loan-bankers from the south came into competition with Jews migrating from Germany or southern France. Finally only a few towns, such as Milan and Genoa, refused to admit Jewish loan-bankers. However, their activities were seriously challenged when the anti-Jewish preaching of the *Franciscans resulted in the establishment of branches of the *Monti di Pietà toward the middle of the 15th century.
The Iberian Peninsula after the Christian reconquest offers many examples of large-scale credit activities and tax farming by Jews. It is known that they provided money for armaments against the Moors. El Cid borrowed from Raquel and Vidas, Jews of Burgos, for his expedition against Valencia. King Alfonso VI of Castile (1072–1109) also obtained loans from Jews for his military expeditions. His successors employed Jews in the financial administration, especially as almoxarifes (revenue collectors), an activity combined with moneylending. Thus, Judah Ibn Ezra was in the service of Alfonso VII, Joseph Ibn Shoshan of Alfonso VIII, and Solomon *Ibn Zadok (Don Çulema) and his son Çag de la Maleha were almoxarifes in the service of Alfonso X, while Meir ibn Shoshan served as his treasurer. When Sancho IV (1258–95) came to the throne, *Abraham el-Barchilon was prominent in the financial administration, supervising the farming of the taxes. Generally, in Castile the Jews abstained from farming the direct taxes, which from 1288 the Cortes opposed. The Jews therefore tended to prefer the administration of the customs and other rights belonging to the office of almoxarife. The court of Aragon relied on Jewish financial administrators in a similar fashion. King James I employed *Benveniste de Porta as a banker, probably giving him as security for his advances the office of bailiff of Barcelona and Gerona. Judah de la *Cavalleria , the most powerful Jew in the Aragonese administration, had control over all the bailiffs of the kingdom. Under Pedro III the family of *Ravaya were most influential. Though during the 14th century the Jews in Aragon and Navarre were subjected to increasing pressures, Judah Ha-Levi and Abraham Aben-Josef of Estella were general farmers of the rents under Charles II and Charles III of Navarre. In Castile – in spite of the Cortes' opposition – Jews such as the *Abrabanel family in Seville continued to be active as almoxarifes. The young Alfonso XI appointed Joseph de *Écija as his almoxarife mayor (c. 1322); Pedro the Cruel (1350–69) made Samuel b. Meir ha-Levi *Abulafia of Toledo, known as the richest Jew of his time, his chief treasurer, and Henry of Trastamara had Joseph *Picho as his financial officer (contador mayor) despite his promise to remove all Jews from royal office (1367).
(post is archived)