Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

When we look at the two, and based off my travels to Europe vs the US, I noticed that the debate is confusing for one major reason: pro choice is very well defined, but not pro life. Pro life implies somebody is alive, but then we look at certain EU states and they state it's pro life to the mom, at the expense of the baby, or it can be pro baby life, or pro life of the family. The concept of the debate uses such superfluous points, that the definitions of the language and assumptions can be changed on a dime. In this case, this made me think, we sohuldn't even be using the label. We should instead clearly delineate, that one is pro for the life of the baby, or pro Christian, but pro life in and of itself confers no meaning beyond being pro life to an entity which may or may not be the baby

When we look at the two, and based off my travels to Europe vs the US, I noticed that the debate is confusing for one major reason: pro choice is very well defined, but not pro life. Pro life implies somebody is alive, but then we look at certain EU states and they state it's pro life to the mom, at the expense of the baby, or it can be pro baby life, or pro life of the family. The concept of the debate uses such superfluous points, that the definitions of the language and assumptions can be changed on a dime. In this case, this made me think, we sohuldn't even be using the label. We should instead clearly delineate, that one is pro for the life of the baby, or pro Christian, but pro life in and of itself confers no meaning beyond being pro life to an entity which may or may not be the baby

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] • 0 pt

Based off the NT and OT, i can not find a single reference that half the crap jews peddle is even Biblical. The Bible would have NEVER bothered to make a distinction between jews and gentiles if race was a social construct. Nor would Genesis have bothered explaining the different tribes and people

[–] • 1 pt

Their religion is a reaction to Christianity. Compiled by a bunch of long beared pedophiles.

[–] • 1 pt

The OT explains why no one likes the jews. And from what i can tell, the death of Jesus was for the atonement of all, not for the jews. Jesus himself said the jews were the synagogue of satan, and that many will not go to heaven. This can further be seen in the book of Enoch (i wonder (((why))) they took it out of canon), where it is explained who the chosen people are: hint, its not the jews

[–] • 0 pt

Jesus was White. Hebrew and Aramaic are Celtic languages

[–] • 0 pt

Bearded

[–] • 0 pt

Actually, long bearded argumentative pedophiles