Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

849

When we look the OT makes reference to Enoch, but the Bible does not have the book of Enoch, or the book of Mccabbee. Why would they be removed and not left in? This is especially interesting since some books aren't even complete, and were still added in to the Bible as canon

When we look the OT makes reference to Enoch, but the Bible does not have the book of Enoch, or the book of Mccabbee. Why would they be removed and not left in? This is especially interesting since some books aren't even complete, and were still added in to the Bible as canon

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

[the old testament is not the story of Jesus]

Luke 24:27 - "Beginning with Moses and all the prophets, [Jesus] interpreted for them the things concerning himself in all the scriptures."

John 5:39, 46 "The Scriptures testify about me... Moses wrote about me."

You don't get it. The entire thing is about Jesus. He is present in creation in Genesis 1, foretold in Genesis 3, the Alpha and the Omega.

I will try to make it abundantly clear if and when we see eye to eye on something, but you are way off on your understanding of Jesus.