Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

When we look the OT makes reference to Enoch, but the Bible does not have the book of Enoch, or the book of Mccabbee. Why would they be removed and not left in? This is especially interesting since some books aren't even complete, and were still added in to the Bible as canon

When we look the OT makes reference to Enoch, but the Bible does not have the book of Enoch, or the book of Mccabbee. Why would they be removed and not left in? This is especially interesting since some books aren't even complete, and were still added in to the Bible as canon

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] • 2 pts

I know quite a bit about Enoch but nothing about Mccabbee tbh. Only the first book of Enoch was written by the "good Enoch". The other 2 were written by the "bad Enoch" (look up the geneologies, there was one down each line). Good Enoch was Noah's great-grandfather, it is theorized that Noah had the book on the ark and that's how it was passed down. The other 2 were written much later. I believe this is why it's not included in the canon. You can quite easily cross reference events that happen in Enoch 1 with events in the canon though, to me - the book of Enoch IS canon. The other 2 are satanic jiberish, written by the nefilim, the "mighty men of old".

If you are interested, this channel makes great videos that show the comparisons between the book of Enoch and the canon (as well as other commentaries and even esoteric writings, they are VERY thorough, and follow the bible to the letter of the word). https://youtu.be/FZJSSOyusvY < this is just one, they have a chapter by chapter commentary that is REALLY insightful. Have a look through their videos.