Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

387

When we look the OT makes reference to Enoch, but the Bible does not have the book of Enoch, or the book of Mccabbee. Why would they be removed and not left in? This is especially interesting since some books aren't even complete, and were still added in to the Bible as canon

When we look the OT makes reference to Enoch, but the Bible does not have the book of Enoch, or the book of Mccabbee. Why would they be removed and not left in? This is especially interesting since some books aren't even complete, and were still added in to the Bible as canon

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

I know quite a bit about Enoch but nothing about Mccabbee tbh. Only the first book of Enoch was written by the "good Enoch". The other 2 were written by the "bad Enoch" (look up the geneologies, there was one down each line). Good Enoch was Noah's great-grandfather, it is theorized that Noah had the book on the ark and that's how it was passed down. The other 2 were written much later. I believe this is why it's not included in the canon. You can quite easily cross reference events that happen in Enoch 1 with events in the canon though, to me - the book of Enoch IS canon. The other 2 are satanic jiberish, written by the nefilim, the "mighty men of old".

If you are interested, this channel makes great videos that show the comparisons between the book of Enoch and the canon (as well as other commentaries and even esoteric writings, they are VERY thorough, and follow the bible to the letter of the word). https://youtu.be/FZJSSOyusvY < this is just one, they have a chapter by chapter commentary that is REALLY insightful. Have a look through their videos.

[–] • 0 pt

Enoch's 1,2 and luminaries, mccabbees, jubilees, book of Adam and eve. All great reads that provide deeper insight.

[–] • -1 pt

The old testament is not Christianity. IT is Judaism. It was added to give historical context and manipulated into its current state of Jewish supremacy. Do not think of the old testament as a part of Christianity, think of it as a story of why Christianity came to be. As a defense against jews.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

The old testament is not Christianity

You appear to know neither.

There is nothing "supreme" about Israel or any of his sons (including Judah). They are consistently portrayed as harlots, unworthy, unfaithful, etc. Most of the prophets just talk about how terrible they are and the judgment they are getting.

There's nothing glorious about being in captivity twice.

Christianity is defined by the man Christ Jesus, who brought the gospel of grace. We know our need for salvation from looking at the perfect law of God.

Jews killed Jesus and rejected the gospel. What kind of crappy "defense against Jews" is that?

Seriously, when was the last time you read more than 5 minutes a day for a week?

[–] • 0 pt

The new testament is the story of Jesus. Not the old testament. So youre...you're.... agreeing with me?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

[the old testament is not the story of Jesus]

Luke 24:27 - "Beginning with Moses and all the prophets, [Jesus] interpreted for them the things concerning himself in all the scriptures."

John 5:39, 46 "The Scriptures testify about me... Moses wrote about me."

You don't get it. The entire thing is about Jesus. He is present in creation in Genesis 1, foretold in Genesis 3, the Alpha and the Omega.

I will try to make it abundantly clear if and when we see eye to eye on something, but you are way off on your understanding of Jesus.