WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

314

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

The only reason islam is still relevant is because of oil, otherwise it would be as relevant as stones and trees worshipping

How would a non-christian country deal with savages that have access to valuable ressources?

Like china? Would they built up their infrastructure, welcome them in, have women hold up "refugees welcome" signs, cover up child rape by foreigners?

[–] 1 pt

What was the religion of your ancestors? I mean those same ancestors who fought through the dark ages up until the second world war and imposed their civilizational model on the rest of the world?

I mean you realize that islam lost to modernity something like 2 centuries ago, right? You do realize that islam has serious problems? And that the only reason it's still around is because some muslims happen to be sitting on natural resources?

You know what muslims countries contribute to global GDP? https://corporatemaldives.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/world-economy-gdp-1.jpg

Talking about fucking useless eaters... And you realize that there are something like 2 billion muslims? 24% of global population? And they contribute 7% to the global GDP?

Those people are a fucking civilizational failure, imagine what it would be like for them without fossil fuel revenues

>Like china? Would they built up their infrastructure, welcome them in, have women hold up "refugees welcome" signs, cover up child rape by foreigners?

You're talking about shitlibs, fucking 20 something green haired atheist lesbians and cucks for the most part

Perhaps we should've taken their natural ressources away.

But that would require an ideology that is not afraid of having imperialistic ambitions, nor too timid to make use of violence against people who are basically the "underdog". As you point out they are backwards and weaker than us. It would require an ideology that roots for Goliath, not (((David))).

Same with shitlibs. It's not socially acceptable to be violent against someone who is weaker. Can't hit women. Can't hit a soycuck if you visit a gym more often than him. You are goliath, they are (((David))).

Will you root for the strong, or would you rather see the meek and underdogs rule?