Many Jewish sources cite Sayce to say that the Amorites were "blue eyed, blonde haired" and "long-headed." But I suspect that there was some kind of confusion when labelling the relevant people in the Egyptian pictures/ Hieroglyphs to Amorites. They must have the wrong time period, after all, since Jews tend to point to Ramses II as the Pharaoh of Exodus, and people made them the authority even though the dates in the Masoretic texts are altered. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE Hittites were Canaanites and here's how they are described in the same book, by the same author. https://pic8.co/sh/S5PCBi.png https://archive.org/details/theracesoftheold00saycuoft/page/n141/mode/2up
Mr. Tomkins has called the Hittite face snouty. It is marked by an excessive prognathism, which we look for in vain among the other populations of Western Asia. The nose is straight, though somewhat broad, the lips full, the cheek-bones high, the eyebrows fairly prominent, the forehead receding like the chin, and the face hairless. The hair of the head was arranged in three plaited tails, one hanging over each shoulder and the third down the back, an arrangement which, as Mr. Tomkins has noted, still survives among the savages of the Lake of Huleh a . In figure the Hittite was stout and thick-limbed, and apparently of no great height. On the Egyptian monuments the Hittites are represented with yellow skins, like the Mongols, except in the tomb of Rekh-ma-Ra, where the Hittite chiefs have brown skins, though that of a child is yellow. The hair is black, the eyes dark brown.
People want to argue about Adamic vs Non-Adamic, but I have not seen sufficient evidence in the Biblical text to indicate such a concept. There would be a lot of text explaining the matter, as it's a core element, and a specific Hebrew word for not being descended from Adam, just like "Adam" is synonymous with "Man". The view adopted by NSDAP, was not Evolution, they despised that, it was the Creationist view, which was the predominant worldview held by European Christians, where you have three main Races which correspond to the three progenitors.
According to Genetic testing, the modern Palestinians aren't really much different from Ancient Canaanites. MENA (incl. Kikes) in general share a lot of unique DNA with the Canaanites. https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/history-and-civilisation/2020/05/dna-from-the-bibles-canaanites-lives-on-in-modern-arabs-and-jews
In data like or we only ever see three extremities, and then mixtures between them. MENA are clearly shown as being off-set towards Negroids & Australoids, meaning that they are a that have received enough European admixture to remain within that level of similarity to them. https://pic8.co/sh/AODIQ7.png
Canaan was the child of Ham, but who was his mother? The euphemism used ("nakedness of the father") is also used in other places in the Bible to denote son/ mother incest (there is no distinction made between biological mother or step mother/ concubine). Since there was not any other mother figure mentioned, we can only assume that Ham took advantage of his own mother, and the product of that incest was cursed, as all inbreds of that kind of union are- but it was much worse, because he was a progenitor of entire nations. Shem & Ham & Canaan would have shared the same mother, but Canaan's father was Ham. If the other children of Ham were different, darker, because of divergent genetic material introduced by their mother, then Canaan's descendants could have only become darkened through mixing with other Hamites. It makes sense that they would mix, having the same progenitor. So Canaanites could have originally looked like messed up Shemites. The Parable about Darnel and Wheat makes a lot of sense with this view. Of course there is also the record of Giants which isn't unique to Biblical text, Mediterranean, Celtic, Germanic & Scandinavian tribes all had stories of Giant beings. Germanic Paganism depicts them as antagonists to their own Gods, and names them the Jötunn (Cognate: Ettin) The Biblical record states that there was Giants, Nephilim, scattered amongst Canaanite tribes, like Goliath.
It's worth noting that Nimrod was a Canaanite, and of course, that means the founding of Sumer/ Babel, although mostly Shemite, would have likely had Canaanites intermixed with them. Aratta was the ancient rival, as well as the origin from whence the Sumerian Shemites came http://arattagar.co.uk/
According to a 4000 year-old inscription by Sumerian Lu-dingir-Ra: "We migrated to where we are living now thousands of years ago, but they were unable to write down from where because they did not know how to write then. Later on inquisitive scribes and archivists in the royal palace studied the orally transmitted information in an attempt to find out about the past. Our people came to this land from a mountainous country to the northeast. But it is also said that some of them had come via sea from a land called Dilmun in the east. And the reason behind this migration is said to be the onset of an unexplained drought in their warm and rainy country. Great Enlil had some of us 'darkheads' settle here.... According to rumours and the results of my research as to why we have called ourselves 'darkheads' I found out that before our forefathers migrated here, blonde haired and blue eyed people were living next to their country. I cannot visualise a person with blonde hair and blue eyes. And I don't think it would be nice. I have not seen any person like that in my country".
Dilmun Migrants = Australoids, possibly hybrids from Indus Valley https://pic8.co/sh/OHKcNZ.jpg Mesopotamian Worshipper Statues https://pic8.co/sh/7Bq5pN.jpg
Babylonians are recorded as being victorious over Aratta (due to them losing favour with Innana), this would mean that the populations of that civilisation were dispersed into all the areas where we see Indo-European Steppe peoples.
You may find the description I wrote on this post interesting too https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/462354
(post is archived)