WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

340

Nearly 2000 years ago, the apostle and Bible author John specifically called out the “synagogue of Satan” (Rev 2:9) and the “throne of Satan” (Rev 2:13) when describing the enemies of the fledgling church. This one-two punch attacked both the religious faith as well as practical lives of believers, in an effort to lure them from the plain and simple truth of God’s intended plans for both salvation and sanctification.

In Rev 2:9, John specifically describes the “synagogue of Satan” as those “claiming to be jews themselves, but are not.” This is a group of ethnic jews who asserted a need to revert to the jewish ritualism of the Babylonian Talmud - which while claiming His name, actually rejected God the Father, and by extension, blasphemed against the Son and His Holy Spirit. In short, an internal perversion of the faith.

Today, this body is manifest in the Zionist movement, luring Christians to assert their allegiance to Israel in Palestine, and perceive them as “great allies” and “God’s Chosen.” It also seeks to deflect criticism of twisted and demonic rabbinical practices such as infant circumcision. Additionally, it creates a starry-eyed idealism about jews in general, both as the greatest of businessmen, as well as perpetual victims. Finally, it drives for “faith-as-well-as” doctrines that seek to replace simple belief and assertion that Jesus Christ is God, incarnated, crucified for man’s sins, risen, and now enthroned at the right hand of The Father, with some hybridized requirement that one must also follow rituals, customs, and earn salvation through good works, denying the glory due Christ alone.

In Rev 2:13, the “throne of Satan” is a bit more cryptic, although there is some discussion of “meat sacrificed to idols,” which historically was a practice of materialism or elementalism, through offerings given to localized or specialized entities in order to secure health, wealth and general prosperity, or as tribute to the Roman Emperor, himself granted deity status. There was also mention of the Nicolaitans (Rev 2:6), linked to the occultist Balaam (Rev 2:14), who promoted racial intermarriage, sexual hedonism, and seducing his contemporary believers into the materialism of idol worship.

The modern equivalent of these today is the secular humanist system easily seen any time you switch on a television or absorb the lion’s share of social media. It is a system that seeks pleasure, and worships the created rather than the Creator, both in material wealth seeking as well as environmentalism. It also ultimately promotes the superiority of some alternative to whom one’s ultimate allegiance be given, rather than God. For some this “alternative” is the state or authoritative collective, for others, it’s the literal cosmos through scientism (which includes both atheism as well as the religious who appeal to human authority and perception as represented by scientists). For yet others it’s blank materialist greed, while yet more simply employ the elevation of self as the pinnacle, either directly, such as in the tenets of Ayn Rand’s Objectivism, or indirectly as they seek pleasure and “self-care” (read: entitlement).

Looking now at the two primary threats as manifested today, it’s clear that both are under the control of the jew. The “religious jews” who promote the lie of Zionism and jewish superiority, and “secular jews” who promote the idolatry inherent to worshipping the material world.

With this in perspective, it makes things easier to categorize.

Nearly 2000 years ago, the apostle and Bible author John specifically called out the “synagogue of Satan” (Rev 2:9) and the “throne of Satan” (Rev 2:13) when describing the enemies of the fledgling church. This one-two punch attacked both the religious faith as well as practical lives of believers, in an effort to lure them from the plain and simple truth of God’s intended plans for both salvation and sanctification. In Rev 2:9, John specifically describes the “synagogue of Satan” as those “claiming to be jews themselves, but are not.” This is a group of ethnic jews who asserted a need to revert to the jewish ritualism of the Babylonian Talmud - which while claiming His name, actually rejected God the Father, and by extension, blasphemed against the Son and His Holy Spirit. In short, an internal perversion of the faith. Today, this body is manifest in the Zionist movement, luring Christians to assert their allegiance to Israel in Palestine, and perceive them as “great allies” and “God’s Chosen.” It also seeks to deflect criticism of twisted and demonic rabbinical practices such as infant circumcision. Additionally, it creates a starry-eyed idealism about jews in general, both as the greatest of businessmen, as well as perpetual victims. Finally, it drives for “faith-as-well-as” doctrines that seek to replace simple belief and assertion that Jesus Christ is God, incarnated, crucified for man’s sins, risen, and now enthroned at the right hand of The Father, with some hybridized requirement that one must also follow rituals, customs, and earn salvation through good works, denying the glory due Christ alone. In Rev 2:13, the “throne of Satan” is a bit more cryptic, although there is some discussion of “meat sacrificed to idols,” which historically was a practice of materialism or elementalism, through offerings given to localized or specialized entities in order to secure health, wealth and general prosperity, or as tribute to the Roman Emperor, himself granted deity status. There was also mention of the Nicolaitans (Rev 2:6), linked to the occultist Balaam (Rev 2:14), who promoted racial intermarriage, sexual hedonism, and seducing his contemporary believers into the materialism of idol worship. The modern equivalent of these today is the secular humanist system easily seen any time you switch on a television or absorb the lion’s share of social media. It is a system that seeks pleasure, and worships the created rather than the Creator, both in material wealth seeking as well as environmentalism. It also ultimately promotes the superiority of some alternative to whom one’s ultimate allegiance be given, rather than God. For some this “alternative” is the state or authoritative collective, for others, it’s the literal cosmos through scientism (which includes both atheism as well as the religious who appeal to human authority and perception as represented by scientists). For yet others it’s blank materialist greed, while yet more simply employ the elevation of self as the pinnacle, either directly, such as in the tenets of Ayn Rand’s Objectivism, or indirectly as they seek pleasure and “self-care” (read: entitlement). Looking now at the two primary threats as manifested today, it’s clear that both are under the control of the jew. The “religious jews” who promote the lie of Zionism and jewish superiority, and “secular jews” who promote the idolatry inherent to worshipping the material world. With this in perspective, it makes things easier to categorize.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

What ever "jews" they were back then are not the same as the "modern ones", the current is a race of warlocks and witches, practitioners of magic and the occult ,something that the old testament spoken very illly of.

[–] 1 pt

This is true. Following their exile during the era of Daniel, they had the chance to truly return to God, but instead returned with more idolatry and blood magic. They mixed this into their faith so deeply that by the time John the Baptist arrived, he operated in the wilderness rather than allow himself to be compromised by just how evil the corporate “faith” had become.

[–] 0 pt

It wasn't the jews that were exiled. It was the Hebrews.

You fucking morons need to actually read the bible and pay attention. The Hebrews were not the jews. Completely different.

Also. Magic isn't real. No jew or person on this planet commands "magic".

[–] 1 pt

The term "jews" as we transliterate it was used by John in Revelation 2:9, "the blasphemy of those who claimed to be jews themselves, but are not." (τὴν βλασφημίαν ἐκ τῶν λεγόντων Ἰουδαίους εἶναι ἑαυτούς, καὶ οὐκ εἰσίν - in the original Greek). Similarly, in John 8:31, Christ is speaking to the "jews" (Ἰουδαίους) and referring specifically to the "faithful" among them who abide in His Word (the Word being Christ himself).

You are correct, however, that what we see today as "jews" are not the same as the "jews" of the scripture, even in the New Testament. The faithful followers were cast out from the secular/Talmudic jews, persecuted, and executed where possible, either by jew inquisitors or at the hands of the Roman government.

This created an ethnic branching, as the faithful scattered and sought refuge beyond the reach of the synagogue of Satan and the throne of Satan, in essence, surrendering their blood birthright for an eternal one. Meanwhile, the Talmudic jews reverted to their nomadic tribal roots, currying favor and intermarrying with whomever the powerful were in the region at the time, largely the arabs, acquiring the hooked noses and thick brows, jew phenotypes we recognize today.

Finally, to your point about "magic," there were demonic interactions that occurred in the Old and New Testament. The "magic" was conjuring of demons and other evils with slight reality-bending powers. The greater purpose of the "magic," however, was an offering of minor earthly authority or blessing in exchange for fealty to demonic entities, Satan included.

Evidence of this would be in Exodus when the court magicians of Pharaoh changed their staves into serpents after Aaron's demonstration (Exodus 7:8-13), subsequently resulting in Aaron's staff devouring the others, as well as Bar-Jesus/Elymas (Acts 13:6-12) who was recognized by Paul as a magician and "son of the Devil" after practicing deceits in the name of God, despite actually calling upon dark and demonic entities. The scripture itself confirms that "magic" did occur, but only as demonic interference.

That said, the "blood magic" rituals of Talmudism are merely symbolic now, even if those practicing them believe they grant powers. The signs have vanished, both for the good and the evil, so all that is left is the faith of those practicing. The luciferians, followers of demonic teachings, the Talmud foremost, may perceive that they have been granted wealth and authority through their rituals, but in truth, their "power" comes from simply offering evil temptations to weak flesh, and capitalizing on man's fallen nature, and Faustian deal-brokering where they, themselves are the devils offering wealth, health and pleasure, in exchange for allegiance, whether directly or through blackmail.

[–] 0 pt

True that no one has real magical powers. But demons can provide the appearance that someone can do real magic. Pharaoh's magicians could do some of the miracles that Moses/Aaron performed (with God providing the power).