I didn't expect to see this from Nigerians.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

(edited )

It goes without saying that the various human sub-species we have now, and any other speciation of hominids that may have occurred in humanity, could not have come from a pair of modern humans. The only way you could possibly theorise it happening is that every "Kind" or "Family" of creature has a progenitor-pair that was physiologically different from all the descended creatures alive today. Essentially, the rules for us, do not apply to Adam & Eve, or the generations closer to them, despite us being descended from them. They would have had to have been designed to produce a wide variety of genetic expressions in their offspring, but once you get generations upon generations down the line, the creatures lose that ability, each branch becomes specialised towards different traits and isolation cements the disparity. Whilst there are negative consequences for us to engage in incest, the divergence between siblings back must have allowed for it, by necessity. Then there are selection pressures & socio-sexual biases, as well as breeding habits that all influence the result too.

Where as Evolution asserts that one "Family" of creature can gradually mutate into another, and we are all derived from single cell organisms, and have shared ancestry with animals. Mutations are like random noise, they are the chaotic product of entropy, which can then be multiplied through incest. Some add random information, others subtract it. The assertion is that all the DNA data that makes us up is completely random, and was always random, so it's therefore plausible for one 'data-set' to gradually transform into a wildly different 'data-set' and only the ones that still function/ survive in the relevant environment live on. It's like the 'immortal monkey with a typewriter in isolation' hypothetical concept though- no, the monkey is not going to eventually write an essay, no matter how long you leave it there. In reality, it will go insane due to the eventual lack of stimuli, the isolation & the surrealness of it all, and try to bash it's own head in or something like that, so it's a dumb hypothetical. Ice crystals forming into orderly shapes out of chaotic liquid is not proof of "Ordo Ab Chao," it's just one of those background parameters of reality that are another form of order- and I don't see how that can be randomly determined by nothingness or how any parameters/ laws of reality can be determined randomly.

It goes without saying that the various human sub-species we have now, and any other speciation of hominids that may have occurred in humanity, could not have come from a pair of modern humans. The only way you could possibly theorise it happening is that every "Kind" or "Family" of creature has a progenitor-pair that was physiologically different from all the descended creatures alive today. Essentially, the rules for us, do not apply to Adam & Eve, or the generations closer to them, despite us being descended from them. They would have had to have been designed to produce a wide variety of genetic expressions in their offspring, but once you get generations upon generations down the line, the creatures lose that ability, each branch becomes specialised towards different traits and isolation cements the disparity. Whilst there are negative consequences for us to engage in incest, the divergence between siblings back must have allowed for it, by necessity. Then there are selection pressures & socio-sexual biases, as well as breeding habits that all influence the result too. Where as Evolution asserts that one "Family" of creature can gradually mutate into another, and we are all derived from single cell organisms, and have shared ancestry with animals. Mutations are like random noise, they are the chaotic product of entropy, which can then be multiplied through incest. Some add random information, others subtract it. The assertion is that all the DNA data that makes us up is completely random, and was always random, so it's therefore plausible for one 'data-set' to gradually transform into a wildly different 'data-set' and only the ones that still function/ survive in the relevant environment live on. It's like the 'immortal monkey with a typewriter in isolation' hypothetical concept though- no, the monkey is not going to eventually write an essay, no matter how long you leave it there. In reality, it will go insane due to the eventual lack of stimuli, the isolation & the surrealness of it all, and try to bash it's own head in or something like that, so it's a dumb hypothetical. Ice crystals forming into orderly shapes out of chaotic liquid is not proof of "Ordo Ab Chao," it's just one of those background parameters of reality that are another form of order- and I don't see how that can be randomly determined by nothingness or how any parameters/ laws of reality can be determined randomly.

link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Neat!

Well reasoned!

Surprisingly impartially well reasoned!

Regardless of Adam & Eve, and whether Eve came before Adam with Lilith, however far back into prehistory humanity extends, this is so; and all humans intrinsically know.

Even chimpanzees prefer blondes.

::: ::: :::

On another note: I may have been sprayed with something while getting the mail. Coughing, sniffling, chills, itchy eyes. Mebbe gonna die. If so, I have hope and faith that y’all are gonna do me proud.

Drama Queen 1990 Qver & Qut.

H&K

BFF

oo

::: ::: :::

Oops!

It’s “Lilith came before Adam with Eve.” ©

A reassociated dissociate used without permission.

Grand finale au revoir, maybe last post, messed up.

(sigh)

::: ::: :::

Ostensibly have antibodies to whatever we were infected with. May be the reason we were spritzed with CoronaVirus while shopping by that (¿MI? CIA? MOSSAD?) agent, the year before it escaped from that Canadian WHO lab and found its way into Wuhan bat soup & artificial adrenochrome.

Anyhoo! Mebbe feeling better.

Not that anyone asked.

::: ::: :::

BTW: What of those military folks purportedly committing suicide rather than submitting to an injection that might kill them? Isn’t that a little too horror film / sexually frustrated desperate housewife / Japanese islander hysterical?

::: ::: :::

Well, this may be my final update to this particular little message in a bottle dispatched to the digital universe.

Goodnight God

Margaret

link

[–] • 0 pt

The author starts out with the premise that the early part of the Book of Genesis is factually and scientifically accurate. Of course, it is not. It is a creation story that comes out of Mesopotamia. The Hebrews adopted it from the Babylonians when they were held captive in Babylon. The human race did not descend from a single man, who was made out of clay and then magically transformed into flesh. Since this is false, it is ridiculous to argue over subsequent parts of the story. If you accept that Adam was the first man, then anything based on that absurd assumption must be absurd, unless it happens to be true by pure accident, which is highly unlikely.

link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

(edited )

That wasn't the point of me posting it. I was surprised that they would even consider or accept the conclusion, that was made, as a possibility. I do agree that if you don't believe the whole claim, there's no point holding on to pieces of it. If it's not true, then it's better to write something new, especially if it's not even relevant to us as a people- if that's even necessary. Obviously the Bible is a religious text, and not some form of scientific study. The claim is that the Creations Story is from God through Moses, which requires a big leap of faith.

The human race did not descend from a single man

I am confused because the Evolution-pushing Scientific Academia published a study that stated we all share a common ancestor-couple, that means we did "descend from a single man," it's just that they are saying that man descended from a long line of organisms, animals & archaic hominids. It's the "Out of Africa" theory though, so I suppose you must have a heretical view, different from the Academia.

I personally can't ever consider Atheism as a possibility now, because no one is able to explain a resolution to the issues I have with it. I don't think it's beneficial for me to be an Atheist either, it's a catalyst for behaviour that is unhelpful, because it cements me as nihilistic, despondent and listless, to the core.

who was made out of clay and then magically transformed into flesh.

But what is "magic" or "magical"? It's just something people don't understand. Our technology would be seen as magic to our ancestors. When the premise is that there is an eternal creator God outside of all creation, heavenly or physical, then by what logic am I saying "that's impossible"? Why wouldn't such a being be able to formulate the necessary particles into cells from the atoms, or 'dust'. that was once clay? I suppose once you engage in that kind of thinking though, people could claim all sorts of crazy things with that premise, and that's why it's a problem.

The Hebrews adopted it from the Babylonians when they were held captive in Babylon.

They adopted it specifically when they were held captive in Babylon? They were already "Judeans" at that point, so are you saying they had no real "Genesis" book before that point? I would assume, that if they adopted it, they would have adopted it prior to that point. I'm guessing you believe that the Jewish timeline is correct, and that the Judeans are essentially descendants of the MENA "Native Canaanites," because the Exodus story is a fabrication too as there's no evidence of them being there at the time they state, correct?
Why would the populace there decide to write a fanfic about milk-drinking pastoralist colonisers from Egypt?

Also, you know that the Latin/ Greek Alphabet is adopted from Phoenicians, and the Phoenician Alphabet is clearly based off of Egyptian Hieroglyphs, so are you saying that our Alphabet comes from Hither Asiatics? If so, I'd also assume that you think Babylonians were always MENA, that means you believe they are superior to us? I mean the Babylonians/ Sumerians apparently developed the various systems required for complex societies/ civilisation and engineered a great deal of inventions.

That wasn't the point of me posting it. I was surprised that they would even consider or accept the conclusion, that was made, as a possibility. I do agree that if you don't believe the whole claim, there's no point holding on to pieces of it. If it's not true, then it's better to write something new, especially if it's not even relevant to us as a people- if that's even necessary. Obviously the Bible is a religious text, and not some form of scientific study. The claim is that the Creations Story is from God through Moses, which requires a big leap of faith. >The human race did not descend from a single man I am confused because the Evolution-pushing Scientific Academia published a study that stated we all share a common ancestor-couple, that means we did "descend from a single man," it's just that they are saying that man descended from a long line of organisms, animals & archaic hominids. It's the "Out of Africa" theory though, so I suppose you must have a heretical view, different from the Academia. I personally can't ever consider Atheism as a possibility now, because no one is able to explain a resolution to the issues I have with it. I don't think it's beneficial for me to be an Atheist either, it's a catalyst for behaviour that is unhelpful, because it cements me as nihilistic, despondent and listless, to the core. >who was made out of clay and then magically transformed into flesh. But what is "magic" or "magical"? It's just something people don't understand. Our technology would be seen as magic to our ancestors. When the premise is that there is an eternal creator God outside of all creation, heavenly or physical, then by what logic am I saying "that's impossible"? Why wouldn't such a being be able to formulate the necessary particles into cells from the atoms, or 'dust'. that was once clay? I suppose once you engage in that kind of thinking though, people could claim all sorts of crazy things with that premise, and that's why it's a problem. >The Hebrews adopted it from the Babylonians when they were held captive in Babylon. They adopted it specifically when they were held captive in Babylon? They were already "Judeans" at that point, so are you saying they had no real "Genesis" book before that point? I would assume, that if they adopted it, they would have adopted it prior to that point. I'm guessing you believe that the Jewish timeline is correct, and that the Judeans are essentially descendants of the MENA "Native Canaanites," because the Exodus story is a fabrication too as there's no evidence of them being there at the time they state, correct? Why would the populace there decide to write a fanfic about milk-drinking pastoralist colonisers from Egypt? Also, you know that the Latin/ Greek Alphabet is adopted from Phoenicians, and the Phoenician Alphabet is clearly based off of Egyptian Hieroglyphs, so are you saying that our Alphabet comes from Hither Asiatics? If so, I'd also assume that you think Babylonians were always MENA, that means you believe they are superior to us? I mean the Babylonians/ Sumerians apparently developed the various systems required for complex societies/ civilisation and engineered a great deal of inventions.

parent
link