WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

622

Bible has nor rules about either. I looked through the real open Bible project. Went to "what does the Bible say about x?" Type in "pedophilia" With how upset Christians get at it, it must be in there somewhere. It's not. First result (ranked on "most relevant"/"closest match") is a quote of Jesus saying something like "if anyone leads little ones into sin, it would be better if they were to tie a millstone to their necks" But the Bible never lists such sexual activity as one of these "sins", in fact, the Bible goes to great lengths to list off all the sins, but sex between adults and children isn't one of them. There are a lot of sex laws, mind you, and they play major roles in the Bible's stories, but pedophilia isn't one of those laws, some of the laws are: - sex with animals - Men having sex with other Men - Adultery, both the one who cheats on their partner and the one who they cheat with - Incest, with both biological family and that of your spouses - Sex with partners who worship another God or follow a different religion, or who are heretics, blaspheming God or taking his name in vain, or are practitioners of magic - Not one mention of acceptable ages for the female sexual partner of a male, even though the Bible never shies away from anything to do with such subjects as sex and sexual partners - Wives of men regarded as being holy and blessed in the Bible mentioned as being as young as 13, for example, the mother Mary of Jesus was only around 14 when she got pregnant with Jesus, even if that were a sex-free pregnancy, the kid still came out the traditional way, and he had a brother, James, who was conceived in the usual fashion.

Type in "lesbianism" - surely something there as well - less than the first, but more supported than pedophilia, as there was mention of women lusting after one another among the "unnatural perversions" god cursed a people with - mfw the biblical case for prohibition of fuzz-bumping is stronger than that for kiddie-raping

Bible has nor rules about either. I looked through the real open Bible project. Went to "what does the Bible say about x?" Type in "pedophilia" With how upset Christians get at it, it must be in there somewhere. It's not. First result (ranked on "most relevant"/"closest match") is a quote of Jesus saying something like "if anyone leads little ones into sin, it would be better if they were to tie a millstone to their necks" But the Bible never lists such sexual activity as one of these "sins", in fact, the Bible goes to great lengths to list off all the sins, but sex between adults and children isn't one of them. There are a lot of sex laws, mind you, and they play major roles in the Bible's stories, but pedophilia isn't one of those laws, some of the laws are: - sex with animals - Men having sex with other Men - Adultery, both the one who cheats on their partner and the one who they cheat with - Incest, with both biological family and that of your spouses - Sex with partners who worship another God or follow a different religion, or who are heretics, blaspheming God or taking his name in vain, or are practitioners of magic - Not one mention of acceptable ages for the female sexual partner of a male, even though the Bible never shies away from anything to do with such subjects as sex and sexual partners - Wives of men regarded as being holy and blessed in the Bible mentioned as being as young as 13, for example, the mother Mary of Jesus was only around 14 when she got pregnant with Jesus, even if that were a sex-free pregnancy, the kid still came out the traditional way, and he had a brother, James, who was conceived in the usual fashion. Type in "lesbianism" - surely something there as well - less than the first, but more supported than pedophilia, as there was mention of women lusting after one another among the "unnatural perversions" god cursed a people with - mfw the biblical case for prohibition of fuzz-bumping is stronger than that for kiddie-raping

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Whats wrong with whites becoming like the jew? The jew has been winning for at least as far back as the 1920s.

This is you 16 days ago. You keep having those edgy thoughts buddy.

I stand by them, adopting the strategies of the guys who are currently holding all the cash and power, seems like a good way to get the cash and power we need to turn things around.

Nothing shameful in learning from your enemy.

[–] 0 pt

Thinking that by adopting their flaws you'll acquire benefits. This might be the best example of surface level thinking I've ever seen, if it can even be considered thinking.

Please never procreate.

[–] 1 pt

the Bible never lists such sexual activity as one of these "sins"

There are many things the bible doesn't describe that are morally wrong. Just because there is no document that says you shouldn't do one thing or another means that it is perfectly reasonable to act in such a manner. Arguing as such is a very jewish tactic to subvert society.

The bible doesn't mention consuming opioids as bad or dangerous, yet most reasonable people know not to do such a thing. The bible doesn't mention not to inject people with poisonous substances like mRNA spike proteins. It does mention not killing people though.

People who don't oppose pedophilia and don't reject lesbianism are weak and feeble minded because they are subjected to jewish propaganda encouraging decrepit behavior. There is an age of sexual consent because children are unable to defend themselves. Parents are in a position to protect children under 18 from miscreants who want to sexually abuse them. Again, jews will try to subvert this authority by trying to lower the age of consent. Feeble minded adults will go along with this nonsense even if the bible says something contrary.

In summary, it's not possible to document everything you should or should not do. You have a brain that allows you to see patterns that allow you to synthesize other things you should or shouldn't do. People who can't do this, shouldn't be parents or be in a position of power.

You are correct.

The thing I'm responding to is what someone said to me yesterday, that all morality cones from the Bible, that all our laws are Biblical in origin.

She said that pedophilia was one of them, I had a handy resource to look through for it, it wasn't there.

"All" doesn't mean "most" it means all.

[–] 0 pt

True. I see too many people unable to make basic decisions, only to be ruled by criminals who take joy in subverting people and controlling them.

I concluded some time back we live in a world of symbolism. There are many people who either by choice or laziness don't recognize and make connections unless explicitly told.

[–] 0 pt

Lol you think it's 18? What about great granny?

[–] 1 pt

How twee, using Saul Alinsky tactics ("Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules").

[–] 1 pt (edited )

He’s also accusing the enemy of what he’s doing.

I'm not in favor of using the Bible as my basis for morality or law, beyond what appeals to me.

I was at a protest, talking about what a supporter supported in terms of political policy, and she said that good political policy was biblical.

Later she clarified that only biblical morality was extant or valid, and that originally all laws and morals were of biblical origin.

I said "including a ban on pedophilia?" And she confirmed it was so.

I mentioned this because Christians were really big on going against the satanic pedophile cult (it's jews and their shabbos goys raping kids and harvesting the adrenochrome, also blackmail amd a way to corrupt and encourage obedience).

So I went home, got on the open Bible project, typed in the word, and looked through it, then went to equivalent words and phrases, couldn't find anything of any of it.

Either all morality is biblical, and it's OK, or it's not ok, but all morality is therfore not biblical, or it's actually in there somewhere, I just can't find it.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

Alinsky is a good resource, so is sun tzu, so is nicholo machiavelli, so are the 48 rules of power.

These strategies can be applied to the service of any cause, against any cause, at any time, they don't contradict each other, and complement each other, because their authors were using a singular constant as the subject of their writings.

If you haven't read up on these, you need to.

[–] 1 pt

You mean modern words aren't used in the Bible, so Christians should be okay with it?

Scatophile. Nope. Not in there. Playing with shit must be okay.

Clearly, the Bible hates degenerates. Clearly, the Bible says to not fuck anyone or anything but your wife, and for some, the Bible suggests only fucking your wife to make babies.

You're a fucking dumbass.

[–] [deleted] -2 pt

The Bible has parts about playing with shit in it, OT books say you should use shit in rituals to cure ailments, if I recall correctly, it's one of those things I came across briefly but never had cause to mention.

[–] 0 pt

Sauce needed.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

I really don't recall, have to remember something I saw briefly a long time ago.

2 Kings 18:27

“But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words? Hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?”

There's also a line about whether one should use cows dung or human dung for baking bread.

And another on relieving the curse of leprosy with human dung and the blood of birds.

Romans 1:26 for women having unnatural sex

Covered that, lesbianism ban did indeed turn out to be biblically justified, was kinda surprised by that.

[–] 0 pt

The question isn't about whether some guy in the sky cares if you rape a child, it's a matter of kids don't deserve or want to be raped and therefore you're not allowed to rape them.

Agreed.

But of thays a moral position not originating from the Bible, then wouldn't that make the supporter someone who rejects that all morality and law is of biblical origin?

[–] 0 pt

The short answer is, some sweating hypocrite that their pops taught them to revere said so.

You obviously won't find neologisms in the Bible. Up until the 1980s the word paedophile was only used in clinical settings, in order to provide a formal definition of an age-old crime. It's a portmanteau word from Greek for child plus love. In fact "paedophilia" is an attempt to normalise an aberration by creating a scientific-sounding term. When I was young they still sold paedo mags on the top shelf as "paedophilia" was not a pejorative but only a clinical term. OP is performing mental gymnastics to declare that the Bible does not condemn adult-child sex because he can't find a 20th Century jewish term in it. This is disingenuous. If you are White then your conscience should be your guide. Prepubescent children are not there for your pleasure. Leave them alone.

They don't have the words incest or bestiality in there either, never prevented them from talking about how those were prohibited, they didn't need the term, they simply described what the act was.

Man shall not lay with another man as he lay with a woman

Thou shalt not lay with a beast.

It's not a lack of vocabulary holding them back, just mention "sex" and "children" and "not okay" and you'd get the picture.

[–] 0 pt

Worthy of a Democrat. He said very plainly that there is no condemnation of fucking kids, not "i don't see this English term w Greek roots."

They don't need the words, there are enough words to describe "child" "sex" and "forbidden" in just about any language.

Look at the parts that ban sodomy, or bestiality, they both don't need those specific words, they can make do with common words that would exist in any written language, and uses those instead.

Why not the same case here?

I get thet can't put everything in, but one would think that child rape would be among the top priority slots of things to ban.