All you have to say whenever I make posts like these is that I am a jew, a cliche used so often that it's lost meaning for most of us, you don't have to respond to anything I say, just call me a jew and that's it. Look, I don't comment on much else, but I do read quite a bit, and I agree with most of it, you can generally assume that if I don't comment on something, It's because I don't think I have anything to add to it. That's like 99% of the posts on this site. But when I encounter something I think I have something to say in response to, I do respond to it. The dissident "White right "has it's blind spots as does every other part of the political spectrum, when it comes to it's specialties - in topics like sex, race, and other matters of demographics (jewish problem and muslim problem and gypsy problem included), it's spot on, but it has issues with subjects not typically within the range of it's focus. On matters like religion, they tend to towards the old ties a lot of them them with conservatism, from which we get a lot of our converts, they seem to focus on the social aspects of the religion, which they refuse to look for alternatives outside of religion that could serve the same purposes, without compromising scientific standards. There is a lack of curiosity regarding religion, they are just as curious about the issues associated with religion as the liberals are with the issues associated with race, they simply find things that confirm their conclusions, and end the investigations there. On matters such as economics and laws, they also have some issues, a lot of them like the idea of using the law to force things to be a certain way, and a lack of trust in people to figure out how to make things work without needing the government to direct them. Yes, we should take measures against things like the banks, corporations, and unions, and we should make a distinction to what is within our borders and outside of it, to avoid foreign labor and compromising of our economic independence, but we should keep things as decentralized as we can. My concern here is with programs like welfare and healthcare, and the dysgenic effect these policies have, charity should be given voluntarily and to those who have been deemed worthy to receive it. Money should just be taken from everyone and given to those who need it to survive, simply because a lot of the genes in those who require such a policy for their survival only serve to parasitize the nation as a whole. When it comes to laws, I prefer we have only the absolute minimum that we need, a lot of it comes down to eugenic concerns, by legislating against degeneracy, we don't get rid of it, rather we force it into hiding, I would rather remove the protections and supports our government provides to degenerate behavior, that way these freaks take themselves out of the gene pool, rather than building their genetic material up in the population and then forming political lobbies that bite us in the ass later once we let out guard down, obviously, there is some things we can do to limit the damage degeneracy can do to the rest of society, but a nation is built by genes, it is the failure to acknowledge the role political policies play on the genetic health of their populations that has led to ruin time and again. There's more, to be sure, but basically, I want to take the parts of each political ideology that these ideologies specialize in and combine them. When it comes to international policies and demographics, the national socialists hit it out of the park, these are what they obssess over the most, and thus it is what we can trust them to get right 100%. When it comes to national policies (among the citizens within the borders), the anarcho-capitalists, who care most about these issues, are the correct ones. When it comes to matters of fact, the atheists (among the dissidents) get it all correct. When it comes to matters of social engineering, the Christians (among the dissidents) are correct. All of these are simply me taking the ideas regarding specific topics from those who best know these particular topics, and we can find a way to combine all of these together into an ideology that has no weak points.