WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

That is the dumbest thing I read in a while.

It's been done so many times before, all that matters in Christianity is accepting Christ as your lord and savior, and following his teachings.

It doesn't matter what his teachings are, or who Christ is, all that can be rewritten in order to better suit the social engineering purposes of our political perspectives.

If we make christ an aryan gentile born into an Aryan gentile community that never associated with jews except as his enemies, who taught the ideas of justice, nationalism, and ethnocentrism, and died for the sake of his people, rather than for the sake of the world.

Could anyone not see it as a better reflection of the kind of Christianity most Christians here would prefer?

We are essentially taking out anything that looks like it supports ideas we disagree with, and adding stuff that supports the ideas we agree with more explicitly

We are making a Bible that is in explicit and no uncertain terms in alignment with our political views, and getting rid of all the subtlety as to what political ideas the Bible advocates for.

If we already know that the book agrees with us, why not produce a new translation that makes it more clear?

The purpise of religion is not to give people a truthful look at reality, but instead to socially engineer a people who are prosperous and happy and who beleive that good political policies are endorsed by sone higher force, and that the goals of their lives as promoted to them by their society are a part of a higher plan in which they play a key role, its about making people feel great about being good citizens

Right now, the Bible isn't doing all it can in that department, so we need to make it better, rather than relying upon preachers to make better use of a tool that has aged past its optimal utility through creative interpretations and arguements as to the subtle messages of the tome, we can simply rewrite the book so that it is explicitly in agreement with our preferred message, and then we've given the preachers a tool that is actually a lot more functional for the purposes they intend with it.

And those quotes you gave us can be left in, to point to as proof that the Bible we've rewritten has not been rewritten but had always been the way it will be.