This is complete garbage. First, he might be "correct" in some aspects but the entire presentation and argument is invalid.
- Redefining "Christianity" - yet somehow embracing the NT, Jesus, etc. (minus Jude, James, and 2 Peter apparently). This is stupid, confusing, and unnecessary. I think he means the Roman Catholic Church, which is barely Christian if at all. Has little to do with the NT at least.
- The ENTIRE argument is about changing the time of the sabbath?!? Who gives a flying rat's bee-hind? And what does it even mean to change the sabbath? The sabbath is whatever the Bible says it is, which I think is sundown Friday to sundown Saturday? Something like that. But the only people who could "change" it would be some sort of establishment, some administration or agency or whatever. We are not ruled by a religious government; Christ is the head, above all, in all.
This is complete garbage. First, *he might be "correct" in some aspects* but the entire presentation and argument is invalid.
1. Redefining "Christianity" - yet somehow embracing the NT, Jesus, etc. (minus Jude, James, and 2 Peter apparently). This is stupid, confusing, and unnecessary. I *think* he means the Roman Catholic Church, which is barely Christian if at all. Has little to do with the NT at least.
2. The ENTIRE argument is about changing the time of the sabbath?!? Who gives a flying rat's bee-hind? And what does it even mean to change the sabbath? The sabbath is whatever the Bible says it is, which I think is sundown Friday to sundown Saturday? Something like that. But the only people who could "change" it would be some sort of establishment, some administration or agency or whatever. We are not ruled by a religious government; Christ is the head, above all, in all.
(post is archived)