See, now this is where you've destroyed your argument: You previously stated that the [OP]'s reply was 'completely contrived' because he was attempting to present the meaning behind the Genesis' seventh-day rest. So when the [OP] used Scripture to restore understanding to the concepts held in the bible, you now say that it is 'irrelevant rambling'...
It has now become clear that you either do not understand the Scriptures, or you do not believe in them. In either scenario, it is fine; however, if you do not believe in Scripture, why do you fervently argue against its principles? This would be akin to arguing over which side of the bed does the Boogey-man sleep under? But if you do believe in the Scriptures, but have questions in regards to its principles, why are you so opposed to the opportunity for another to expound upon the verses that you have questions about?
Furthermore, seek the Holy Spirit for understanding, "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." Matthew 7:7
Amen Official. I look forward to hanging out with you in Kingdom that is to come!
No...
(post is archived)