Textus Receptus only, brothers.
Textus Receptus only, brothers.
Look for editions that date to the 1920s or so
Look for editions that date to the 1920s or so
You're not going to find a 1920 print for cheap.
I bought a leather bound 1611 KJV bible.
You're not going to find a 1920 print for cheap.
I bought a leather bound 1611 KJV bible.
I currently have 2 1920 print kjv both for sale real cheap. $20
I currently have 2 1920 print kjv both for sale real cheap. $20
Then I'm wrong and they're easier to get. That's awesome.
Then I'm wrong and they're easier to get. That's awesome.
>You're not going to find a 1920 print for cheap
Hey Hey Hey! That's jew talk.
>>You're not going to find a 1920 print for cheap
Hey Hey Hey! That's jew talk.
kek
kek
Me, too. I got the Oxford Quartercentenary Edition of the 1611 King James Bible. It reproduces the original, down to the typos. I now have four Bibles, the 1611, a King James revised edition in floppy leather, a huge King James revised hardcover with pictures from classic European paintings (the same edition of the Bible Elvis Prestley owned, by the way), and a Knox Catholic Bible that was given to me by a nun. Also a Hebrew Bible, Old and New Testaments. And a Koran. But I really like the Oxford leather hardcover boxed edition of 1611. I started to read it all the way through from front to back, but got bogged down in Leviticus. All those Jew rules.
Me, too. I got the Oxford Quartercentenary Edition of the 1611 King James Bible. It reproduces the original, down to the typos. I now have four Bibles, the 1611, a King James revised edition in floppy leather, a huge King James revised hardcover with pictures from classic European paintings (the same edition of the Bible Elvis Prestley owned, by the way), and a Knox Catholic Bible that was given to me by a nun. Also a Hebrew Bible, Old and New Testaments. And a Koran. But I really like the Oxford leather hardcover boxed edition of 1611. I started to read it all the way through from front to back, but got bogged down in Leviticus. All those Jew rules.
I may try to find a "modernized" (contemporary English) 1611 KJV bible but I'm not sure what to look for precisely.
I may try to find a "modernized" (contemporary English) 1611 KJV bible but I'm not sure what to look for precisely.
I got one for less than new, on Ebay. But one of those things you gotta just watch for.
I got one for less than new, on Ebay. But one of those things you gotta just watch for.
Nice. Suppose that's an option too.
Nice. Suppose that's an option too.
I understand the call for the King James version because it's errors are known, but the language is a tough one for a lot of people. Words now often mean something different when the authorized version was written.
I had a couple come to my door once who sort of shared the gospel, in a offbeat way. After a short conversation I asked if they were King James only fans. They affirmed they only used the King James version for their bible reading; it was the only true version of the bible. I then asked what Jesus meant in Matthew 19:14 when he said to "But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven." The woman said something along the lines that she guessed Jesus wanted the children to suffer. I pointed out that suffer meant allow and maybe they should get a bible they could understand.
I understand the call for the King James version because it's errors are known, but the language is a tough one for a lot of people. Words now often mean something different when the authorized version was written.
I had a couple come to my door once who sort of shared the gospel, in a offbeat way. After a short conversation I asked if they were King James only fans. They affirmed they only used the King James version for their bible reading; it was the only true version of the bible. I then asked what Jesus meant in Matthew 19:14 when he said to "But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven." The woman said something along the lines that she guessed Jesus wanted the children to suffer. I pointed out that suffer meant allow and maybe they should get a bible they could understand.
I switched years ago, and the language was the reason it took me so long to do so. Once you understand some basic rules, and define a few outdated words for things, it's worth way more than the time it takes to do that. I won't even bother with any other version anymore. KJV is it.
I switched years ago, and the language was the reason it took me so long to do so. Once you understand some basic rules, and define a few outdated words for things, it's worth way more than the time it takes to do that. I won't even bother with any other version anymore. KJV is it.
Those people just need a vocabulary. Its not as if suffer used in that manner is exclusive to the bible of any version. Their solution isn't necessarily a different bible but some education in English.
Those people just need a vocabulary. Its not as if suffer used in that manner is exclusive to the bible of any version. Their solution isn't necessarily a different bible but some education in English.
Exactly.
This is why the current batch of "college students" are against "women's suffrage".
LOL
Exactly.
This is why the current batch of "college students" are against "women's suffrage".
LOL
Amen, brother. It's English, people. You're not niggers -- learn your own language.
Amen, brother. It's English, people. You're not niggers -- learn your own language.
If you tie your faith to your skin color mate, you are not in the right camp.
If you tie your faith to your skin color mate, you are not in the right camp.
If you think race is just skin color, you don't understand biology.
If you think race is just skin color, you don't understand biology.
If you think skin color or race has anything to do with "why" you are here or your "condition" your Creator sees you in, you dont understand life.
If you think skin color or race has anything to do with "why" you are here or your "condition" your Creator sees you in, you dont understand life.
I am simply helping out Whites who are Christian. There is a racial message in the bible even if I am not religious. My race is my religion.
I am simply helping out Whites who are Christian. There is a racial message in the bible even if I am not religious. My race is my religion.
>I am simply helping out Whites who are Christian.
snort
Just dont mate. Heaping coals is what you are doing.
>>I am simply helping out Whites who are Christian.
snort
Just dont mate. Heaping coals is what you are doing.
The bible is for the White race only. Period. If you know anything about Christian Identity then you will understand. It is a book only for the White race.
The bible is for the White race only. Period. If you know anything about Christian Identity then you will understand. It is a book only for the White race.
Christianity is the white religion. For almost two thousand years whites have believed in it, died for it, and shaped it into what it is today. It is nobody else's religion. Other races are free to call themselves Christians if they want, but whites own this religion. It's not the Jew's. It's not the Korean's. It's not the nigger's. It's ours.
Christianity is the white religion. For almost two thousand years whites have believed in it, died for it, and shaped it into what it is today. It is nobody else's religion. Other races are free to call themselves Christians if they want, but whites own this religion. It's not the Jew's. It's not the Korean's. It's not the nigger's. It's ours.
You speak satans words.
You speak satans words.
Where in the bible does it say to gass the kikes?
Where in the bible does it say to gass the kikes?
Revelations 2:9 mentions the jews aren't real jews but of the synagogue of satan and they are of their father the devil and there is no truth in them .
Revelations 2:9 mentions the jews aren't real jews but of the synagogue of satan and they are of their father the devil and there is no truth in them .
The only real Jews left are Messianic Jews. The believe Christ is the savior. Not too much difference between them and 7th Day Adventists aside from the clear race difference.
Saturday is the Sabbath.
Avoid unclean meats. Bacon and shrimp are off the menu.
The only real Jews left are Messianic Jews. The believe Christ is the savior. Not too much difference between them and 7th Day Adventists aside from the clear race difference.
Saturday is the Sabbath.
Avoid unclean meats. Bacon and shrimp are off the menu.
The karaite jews disavow the talmud, the rest are talmudic zionists.
The karaite jews disavow the talmud, the rest are talmudic zionists.
You have to read between the lines faggot.
>
You have to read between the lines faggot.
Yeah exactly its more confusion than not. All i get outta it is usury is bad and anybody promoting it needs to be run out or put down.
Our entire monitary system is based on usury. The united states is a cesspool of sin.
Yeah exactly its more confusion than not. All i get outta it is usury is bad and anybody promoting it needs to be run out or put down.
Our entire monitary system is based on usury. The united states is a cesspool of sin.
What about the ones BEFORE that. Enoch was obviously abducted by aliens.
What about the ones BEFORE that. Enoch was obviously abducted by aliens.
>Get the King James version and only the King James version. The ones that come after are kiked.
https://biblehub.com/exodus/20-13.htm
>King James Bible Thou shalt not kill.
>New King James Version “You shall not murder.
Guess which isn't accurate...
>>Get the King James version and only the King James version. The ones that come after are kiked.
https://biblehub.com/exodus/20-13.htm
>>King James Bible Thou shalt not kill.
>>New King James Version “You shall not murder.
Guess which isn't accurate...
In ancient times, and in the times of King James, it was understood that you had to kill sometimes. Everybody killed to eat. They killed when attacked by other hostile nations. They killed to defend themselves against bandits. It was understood that "shalt not kill" meant "shalt not murder."
In ancient times, and in the times of King James, it was understood that you had to kill sometimes. Everybody killed to eat. They killed when attacked by other hostile nations. They killed to defend themselves against bandits. It was understood that "shalt not kill" meant "shalt not murder."
Yes and no... There were multiple words for "to kill" and the original word in hebrew is to kill in the sense of murder https://biblehub.com/hebrew/7523.htm "ratsach" (raw-tsakh') רָצַח to murder, slay
It's like in the law, there's a difference between, murder and manslaughter. And there are also different types of categories of manslaughter
Murder implies 'malice aforethought' to begin with, it's not an accident nor self defense
Yes and no... There were multiple words for "to kill" and the original word in hebrew is to kill in the sense of murder https://biblehub.com/hebrew/7523.htm "ratsach" (raw-tsakh') רָצַח to murder, slay
It's like in the law, there's a difference between, murder and manslaughter. And there are also different types of categories of manslaughter
Murder implies 'malice aforethought' to begin with, it's not an accident nor self defense
The ones that come after are kiked.
Not the whole Bible written by jews tho.
>The ones that come after are kiked.
Not the whole Bible written by jews tho.
The jews censored it later on. The bible is for the White race and contains a racial message.
The jews censored it later on. The bible is for the White race and contains a racial message.
(post is archived)