because like said the the others are wrong because they are based on the wrong manuscripts and later revisions by liberal scholars .....do a seach in all the changes made by the modern scholars
I'm aware that some have made massive changes; like the NIV that aren't even worth reviewing - others however have been done with even older manuscripts than the KJV and are worth a look. Just because a King commission it (allegedly) and shakespeare wrote some of it (allegedly) doesn't add to its validity. Other versions need not be ignored - I will agree that liberal scholars are usually a deal-breaker though.
(post is archived)