So then are you and your husband the chosen ones, and how do you know if you are chosen?
So then are you and your husband the chosen ones, and how do you know if you are chosen?
I read that He even made the wicked for the day of judgment. So why did he create them to suffer for all eternity for the wickedness He created in them? It would be better - in my opinion - that none of them were born. However, I believe that to be fear on a transparent level that I could possibly not be among the chosen, and God forbid that this not be the case. Should we not pity them for the wickedness that He created in them for the suffering they must endure for the purposes of their creation? As a Quantum theorist, I'd imagine that He - like I have read - is a God of many dimensions. Perhaps, for instance, it is like He has transposed His consciousness to the multiple possibilities of the main realm He created under the heavens for an in-depth and individual look into how many He could save? Then - to me - He must be playing out a script of some kind based off of the highest probability and projectile of the many He could save - "the chosen few" - versus the many that are not; Not based off of favoritism for one individual, but rather off of the necessity for salvation for the more "few" He could save. Because perhaps that individual He'd want to save falls under the lower projectile of probability for a lesser amount of salvation then a higher one. Then He'd in turn disregard that one for the many more few he can save then the smaller amount? Which if that be so; would it not prove His word correct that He is no respecter of persons, and that there is no one righteous no not one? Meaning He did not come for one person in particular, but for that one dimension that housed the higher projectile of the few ("chosen") then the least amount of the few "chosen"? Then even the chosen are not worthy, but really lucky - by His Grace - that they fall under the probability in the higher percentage/projectile, which is why they should not think higher of themselves then they ought? I read also that as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the days of the coming of the son of man, and even then there was only one family saved out of the many. Also, when Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed, Abraham asks God to save the city if he could find a specified few. God already knew there were none, so why did He allow Abraham to make such a plea a couple of times over? So really the book is already written and finished. What is the point of freewill then, or the interpretation of it thereof when the hairs on our head have already been numbered since before our conception? It almost seems like another form of control, or perhaps this is a tainted man made interpretation implanting this understanding for that fearful control?
I read that He even made the wicked for the day of judgment. So why did he create them to suffer for all eternity for the wickedness He created in them? It would be better - in my opinion - that none of them were born. However, I believe that to be fear on a transparent level that I could possibly not be among the chosen, and God forbid that this not be the case. Should we not pity them for the wickedness that He created in them for the suffering they must endure for the purposes of their creation? As a Quantum theorist, I'd imagine that He - like I have read - is a God of many dimensions. Perhaps, for instance, it is like He has transposed His consciousness to the multiple possibilities of the main realm He created under the heavens for an in-depth and individual look into how many He could save? Then - to me - He must be playing out a script of some kind based off of the highest probability and projectile of the many He could save - "the chosen few" - versus the many that are not; Not based off of favoritism for one individual, but rather off of the necessity for salvation for the more "few" He could save. Because perhaps that individual He'd want to save falls under the lower projectile of probability for a lesser amount of salvation then a higher one. Then He'd in turn disregard that one for the many more few he can save then the smaller amount? Which if that be so; would it not prove His word correct that He is no respecter of persons, and that there is no one righteous no not one? Meaning He did not come for one person in particular, but for that one dimension that housed the higher projectile of the few ("chosen") then the least amount of the few "chosen"? Then even the chosen are not worthy, but really lucky - by His Grace - that they fall under the probability in the higher percentage/projectile, which is why they should not think higher of themselves then they ought? I read also that as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the days of the coming of the son of man, and even then there was only one family saved out of the many. Also, when Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed, Abraham asks God to save the city if he could find a specified few. God already knew there were none, so why did He allow Abraham to make such a plea a couple of times over? So really the book is already written and finished. What is the point of freewill then, or the interpretation of it thereof when the hairs on our head have already been numbered since before our conception? It almost seems like another form of control, or perhaps this is a tainted man made interpretation implanting this understanding for that fearful control?
In other words, where is the hope then in His sacrifice to save the few versus the His obedience to save all (All) men?
In other words, where is the hope then in His sacrifice to save the few versus the His obedience to save all (All) men?
(post is archived)