Pardon me OK, but what are you implying? I think you missed the point of this article, with the upmost respect; No punt intended. The article is conveying through scripture that Jesus was trying to show the hypocrisy of the pharisees, that they were continually pointing out to him and his followers that they were doing that which was "unlawful" on the Sabbath, when in all actuality them (the pharisees) just doing their priestly duties ("work") on the Sabbath were profaning it in the first place by working on the Sabbath. Also, this article, in very critical and in precise analytical detail is - factually - pointing out that there are no occurrence in the New Testament where Jesus is admonishing the people or His disciples to keep the sabbath, but rather to not just consider one day Holy, but all, making Jesus a magnifying glass to the law of the sabbath, rather then one breaking it. Remember, the aims of argument is not to ignore the basis of what has been put forth, but - rather - to overcome it through acknowledgement first, then through detailed opposition of what has been put forth. Or, to submit to it as indisputable, with a desire for understanding of the lack of knowledge thereof; Henceforth, a "Question", which can - perhaps - reopen up the possibilities of your oppositions in the first place and give them merit, which I am presuming - I believe rightfully so - is the difference between murdering and killing, not particularly on the sabbath, because you imply that not by referencing Mark 3:4, but rather use that scripture for the basis of you accusing the Author of the article for not taking this into consideration, when it has nothing to do with the implication of the article in the first place, nor the foundation of it's purpose thereof. The Author is merely pointing out that all days should be kept as that of the sabbath, rather then considering just one day to be Holy. I hope this clears up your confusion, bro.
Pardon me OK, but what are you implying? I think you missed the point of this article, with the upmost respect; No punt intended. The article is conveying through scripture that Jesus was trying to show the hypocrisy of the pharisees, that they were continually pointing out to him and his followers that they were doing that which was "unlawful" on the Sabbath, when in all actuality them (the pharisees) just doing their priestly duties ("work") on the Sabbath were profaning it in the first place by working on the Sabbath. Also, this article, in very critical and in precise analytical detail is - factually - pointing out that there are no occurrence in the New Testament where Jesus is admonishing the people or His disciples to keep the sabbath, but rather to not just consider one day Holy, but all, making Jesus a magnifying glass to the law of the sabbath, rather then one breaking it. Remember, the aims of argument is not to ignore the basis of what has been put forth, but - rather - to overcome it through acknowledgement first, then through detailed opposition of what has been put forth. Or, to submit to it as indisputable, with a desire for understanding of the lack of knowledge thereof; Henceforth, a "Question", which can - perhaps - reopen up the possibilities of your oppositions in the first place and give them merit, which I am presuming - I believe rightfully so - is the difference between murdering and killing, not particularly on the sabbath, because you imply that not by referencing Mark 3:4, but rather use that scripture for the basis of you accusing the Author of the article for not taking this into consideration, when it has nothing to do with the implication of the article in the first place, nor the foundation of it's purpose thereof. The Author is merely pointing out that all days should be kept as that of the sabbath, rather then considering just one day to be Holy. I hope this clears up your confusion, bro.
Just take a nap. It's a day of rest, after all.
Just take a nap. It's a day of rest, after all.
>Mar 3:4 And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil? to save life, or to kill? But they held their peace.
Pretty sure the translation isn't accurate. To kill isn't to do evil, to murder is.
There's a difference between murder and self defense, there's a difference between murder and a fatal accident. Difference that isn't taken into consideration here, obviously.
>>Mar 3:4 And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, **or to do evil**? to save life, **or to kill**? But they held their peace.
Pretty sure the translation isn't accurate. To kill isn't to do evil, to murder is.
There's a difference between murder and self defense, there's a difference between murder and a fatal accident. Difference that isn't taken into consideration here, obviously.
Pardon me OK, but what are you implying? I think you missed the point of this article, with the upmost respect; No punt intended. The article is conveying through scripture that Jesus was trying to show the hypocrisy of the pharisees, that they were continually pointing out to him and his followers that they were doing that which was "unlawful" on the Sabbath, when in all actuality them (the pharisees) just doing their priestly duties ("work") on the Sabbath were profaning it in the first place by working on the Sabbath. Also, this article, in very critical and in precise analytical detail is - factually - pointing out that there are no occurrence in the New Testament where Jesus is admonishing the people or His disciples to keep the sabbath, but rather to not just consider one day Holy, but all, making Jesus a magnifying glass to the law of the sabbath, rather then one breaking it. Remember, the aims of argument is not to ignore the basis of what has been put forth, but - rather - to overcome it through acknowledgement first, then through detailed opposition of what has been put forth. Or, to submit to it as indisputable, with a desire for understanding of the lack of knowledge thereof; Henceforth, a "Question", which can - perhaps - reopen up the possibilities of your oppositions in the first place and give them merit, which I am presuming - I believe rightfully so - is the difference between murdering and killing, not particularly on the sabbath, because you imply that not by referencing Mark 3:4, but rather use that scripture for the basis of you accusing the Author of the article for not taking this into consideration, when it has nothing to do with the implication of the article in the first place, nor the foundation of it's purpose thereof. The Author is merely pointing out that all days should be kept as that of the sabbath, rather then considering just one day to be Holy. I hope this clears up your confusion, bro.
Pardon me OK, but what are you implying? I think you missed the point of this article, with the upmost respect; No punt intended. The article is conveying through scripture that Jesus was trying to show the hypocrisy of the pharisees, that they were continually pointing out to him and his followers that they were doing that which was "unlawful" on the Sabbath, when in all actuality them (the pharisees) just doing their priestly duties ("work") on the Sabbath were profaning it in the first place by working on the Sabbath. Also, this article, in very critical and in precise analytical detail is - factually - pointing out that there are no occurrence in the New Testament where Jesus is admonishing the people or His disciples to keep the sabbath, but rather to not just consider one day Holy, but all, making Jesus a magnifying glass to the law of the sabbath, rather then one breaking it. Remember, the aims of argument is not to ignore the basis of what has been put forth, but - rather - to overcome it through acknowledgement first, then through detailed opposition of what has been put forth. Or, to submit to it as indisputable, with a desire for understanding of the lack of knowledge thereof; Henceforth, a "Question", which can - perhaps - reopen up the possibilities of your oppositions in the first place and give them merit, which I am presuming - I believe rightfully so - is the difference between murdering and killing, not particularly on the sabbath, because you imply that not by referencing Mark 3:4, but rather use that scripture for the basis of you accusing the Author of the article for not taking this into consideration, when it has nothing to do with the implication of the article in the first place, nor the foundation of it's purpose thereof. The Author is merely pointing out that all days should be kept as that of the sabbath, rather then considering just one day to be Holy. I hope this clears up your confusion, bro.
The author is relying on a quote implicitly equating evil to killing, to build his argument, bro
I question the entire validity of his perspective on that basis, bro
The author is relying on a quote implicitly equating evil to killing, to build his argument, bro
I question the entire validity of his perspective on that basis, bro
Can you lead me to where? Perhaps I missed that. So I can understand more in-depth what you are saying. Thank You bro.
Can you lead me to where? Perhaps I missed that. So I can understand more in-depth what you are saying. Thank You bro.
(post is archived)