In other words, the Christian / theist with an heretical (false) understanding of God contradicts himself, insofar as he predicates something false of the Perfectly True, which he affirms.
And the atheist, in attempting to disprove God, is evidently not actually talking about God, since God is the One Who is entirely necessary, and thus can't not exist.
I can see how this dynamic would favour the theist.
In other words, the Christian / theist with an heretical (false) understanding of God contradicts himself, insofar as he predicates something false of the Perfectly True, which he affirms.
And the atheist, in attempting to disprove God, is *evidently* not actually talking about God, since God is the One Who is entirely *necessary*, and thus can't *not* exist.
I can see how this dynamic would favour the theist.
@Chiro @KingOfWhiteAmerica
Your replies suck. Do you even perceive how much your replies suck? Christ.
Your replies suck. Do you even perceive how much your replies suck? Christ.
Don't take the Lord's name in vain, ARM.
Don't take the Lord's name in vain, ARM.
(post is archived)