In your little mind you can have your own argument if you want. The fact that the armed citizen cannot be 'ruled' by Communism (i did not say CCP, YOU did) stands.
In your little mind you can have your own argument if you want.
lol Ad-hominem...
The fact that the armed citizen cannot be 'ruled' by Communism
That's not what you said in the first place.
(i did not say CCP, YOU did) stands.
The topic is HK and thus China. So yeah, CCP.
The 'topic' is a Communist rule can not rule an armed citizenry, and it does not matter where that is. I still have no idea 'what' you are arguing. Are you defending Communism or the disarmed sheep? OR, trying to pretend that being armed does not prevent communist rule?
lol First ad-hominem, and now you are trying to divert the topic and put words in my mouth.
You said the CCP needs to disarm its citizens to then do as they please.
I told you that it's not necessary since owning firearms is already illegal in HK.
So the CCP won't have to disarm them.
Everything else is irrelevant.
(post is archived)