I am sorry, that was exactly my point.
That wasn't your point at all because you said the CCP has to disarm its citizen when they never were armed in the first place.
So unless you are talking about sticks, knives and stones, your point doesn't stand.
In your little mind you can have your own argument if you want. The fact that the armed citizen cannot be 'ruled' by Communism (i did not say CCP, YOU did) stands.
In your little mind you can have your own argument if you want.
lol Ad-hominem...
The fact that the armed citizen cannot be 'ruled' by Communism
That's not what you said in the first place.
(i did not say CCP, YOU did) stands.
The topic is HK and thus China. So yeah, CCP.
The 'topic' is a Communist rule can not rule an armed citizenry, and it does not matter where that is. I still have no idea 'what' you are arguing. Are you defending Communism or the disarmed sheep? OR, trying to pretend that being armed does not prevent communist rule?
(post is archived)