WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

783

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The 'topic' is a Communist rule can not rule an armed citizenry, and it does not matter where that is. I still have no idea 'what' you are arguing. Are you defending Communism or the disarmed sheep? OR, trying to pretend that being armed does not prevent communist rule?

[–] 0 pt

lol First ad-hominem, and now you are trying to divert the topic and put words in my mouth.

You said the CCP needs to disarm its citizens to then do as they please.

I told you that it's not necessary since owning firearms is already illegal in HK.

So the CCP won't have to disarm them.

Everything else is irrelevant.

[–] 0 pt

Nope. That is what your little mind read in defense of the CCP i assume? I said A Communist Gov. as in Any Communist Gov. throughout History and it now applies to our own Liberal/communist party.