WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

565

The 'truth' is an idea which defies scrutiny. Censorship is the opposite of truth; it is the promotion of lies.

It appears that the very same disease of censorship on Voat was transmitted here to Poal during the great migration. There is a sizeable group of accounts which have taken control of popular subs, and then ban the truth from coming through, thereby promoting lies and growing the disease.

It is likely that these very same accounts are controlled opposition judging by their ardent and CONSTANT projection onto others of being a jew while their ideas are questioned, at which point they are permanently banned -- akin to a child unable handle contrary thought.

In their twisted world-view, they define a sub as 'property' for which they decree to deny access, yet Poal does not belong to them, and neither does speech (do you think they own your property @AOU ?).

The link attached is a conversation between @AntiClutch and myself regarding this very same topic of censorship and ownership which ultimately led to censoring of my speech on not just that sub, but 11 others controlled by him:

This egregious act would be comical if it weren't so chilling considering that some of these sub have more bans than posts... It is clear that already the specter of censorship is taking hold right here in one of the VERY LAST bastions of free-speech during a time when it is being eradicated all over the internet and all over the world. It may appear insignificant at first, but this is all it takes for Poal to become yet another dust-bowl of freedom.

What are your thoughts?

>The *'truth'* is an idea which defies scrutiny. Censorship is the *opposite* of truth; it is the promotion of lies. It appears that the very same disease of censorship on Voat was transmitted here to Poal during the great migration. There is a sizeable group of accounts which have taken control of popular subs, and then ban the truth from coming through, thereby promoting lies and growing the disease. It is likely that these very same accounts are controlled opposition judging by their ardent and CONSTANT projection onto others of being a jew while their ideas are questioned, at which point they are permanently banned -- akin to a child unable handle contrary thought. In their twisted world-view, they define a sub as 'property' for which they decree to deny access, yet Poal does not belong to them, and neither does speech (do you think they own your property @AOU ?). The link attached is a conversation between @AntiClutch and myself regarding this very same topic of censorship and ownership which ultimately led to censoring of my speech on not *just* that sub, but 11 others controlled by him: - [MFW](https://poal.co/s/MFW) - [TFW](https://poal.co/s/TFW) - [DeathOfAmerica](https://poal.co/s/DeathOfAmerica) - [AmericaIsDead](https://poal.co/s/AmericaIsDead) - [AnonExplains](https://poal.co/s/AnonExplains) - [Diversity](https://poal.co/s/Diversity) - [FellowWhites](https://poal.co/s/FellowWhites) - [Jewess](https://poal.co/s/Jewess) - [Jewflu](https://poal.co/s/Jewflu) - [WhosePrivilege](https://poal.co/s/WhosePrivilege) - [Kikes](https://poal.co/s/Kikes) This egregious act would be comical if it weren't so chilling considering that some of these sub have **more bans than posts**... It is clear that *already* the specter of censorship is taking hold right here in one of the **VERY LAST** bastions of free-speech during a time when it is being eradicated all over the internet and all over the world. It may appear insignificant at first, but this is all it takes for Poal to become yet another dust-bowl of freedom. What are your thoughts?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

so that they can be accepted by norms.

No. Norms say I shouldn't say 'nigger'.

Norms say I shouldn't say 'kike'.

Norms say I shouldn't...

No.

Fuck norms. I have no interest in them. I have interest in using language in the way I'd like.

If I wanted to experience norms, I'd be on reddit.

e;

That's not to say reddit is normal or good in anyway.

[–] 0 pt

How does saying those words further your message? How do you get from 'you can't say that' to 'I will now accept for you to say that'? You're trying to go from 0-100 in an instant and it isn't ever going to work, and in fact will actually just makes things worse.

The norms are our future army, if you have patience.

[–] 0 pt

if you have patience

No. I did that for decades. I was patient. I bit my tongue. I didn't speak to the truth. I spoke on the lies because they were the norms.

No. Look where that got us. That put us in a worse place. That is LITERALLY "just wait" "soon" "it's happening" while it's not actually happening.

My message is one of fact. I can back it up with evidence. With history. With law. I don't need to be kind when these norms are causing the genocide of my kin. That's worse, far worse, than me calling a black as a nigger. For you to claim that me calling a black a nigger is worse than language which causes my people to be murdered off by said nigger and the kike behind that nigger then come the fuck on. This conversation is over. You're not arguing from a point of honesty.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Patience

My meaning is not telling lies or holding your tongue, it's carefully explaining in a way which can be accepted. 'Patience' as in it takes a lot longer than it normally would. You must understand that the enemy knows the crowd and has indoctrinated them for generations from words, phrases, and ideas to protect the lie: this is what you're up against.

Intentionally stepping on the land-mines only makes you and your message look belligerent, and emboldens them to hate all of us more.