Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

The 'truth' is an idea which defies scrutiny. Censorship is the opposite of truth; it is the promotion of lies.

It appears that the very same disease of censorship on Voat was transmitted here to Poal during the great migration. There is a sizeable group of accounts which have taken control of popular subs, and then ban the truth from coming through, thereby promoting lies and growing the disease.

It is likely that these very same accounts are controlled opposition judging by their ardent and CONSTANT projection onto others of being a jew while their ideas are questioned, at which point they are permanently banned -- akin to a child unable handle contrary thought.

In their twisted world-view, they define a sub as 'property' for which they decree to deny access, yet Poal does not belong to them, and neither does speech (do you think they own your property @AOU ?).

The link attached is a conversation between @AntiClutch and myself regarding this very same topic of censorship and ownership which ultimately led to censoring of my speech on not just that sub, but 11 others controlled by him:

This egregious act would be comical if it weren't so chilling considering that some of these sub have more bans than posts... It is clear that already the specter of censorship is taking hold right here in one of the VERY LAST bastions of free-speech during a time when it is being eradicated all over the internet and all over the world. It may appear insignificant at first, but this is all it takes for Poal to become yet another dust-bowl of freedom.

What are your thoughts?

>The *'truth'* is an idea which defies scrutiny. Censorship is the *opposite* of truth; it is the promotion of lies. It appears that the very same disease of censorship on Voat was transmitted here to Poal during the great migration. There is a sizeable group of accounts which have taken control of popular subs, and then ban the truth from coming through, thereby promoting lies and growing the disease. It is likely that these very same accounts are controlled opposition judging by their ardent and CONSTANT projection onto others of being a jew while their ideas are questioned, at which point they are permanently banned -- akin to a child unable handle contrary thought. In their twisted world-view, they define a sub as 'property' for which they decree to deny access, yet Poal does not belong to them, and neither does speech (do you think they own your property @AOU ?). The link attached is a conversation between @AntiClutch and myself regarding this very same topic of censorship and ownership which ultimately led to censoring of my speech on not *just* that sub, but 11 others controlled by him: - [MFW](https://poal.co/s/MFW) - [TFW](https://poal.co/s/TFW) - [DeathOfAmerica](https://poal.co/s/DeathOfAmerica) - [AmericaIsDead](https://poal.co/s/AmericaIsDead) - [AnonExplains](https://poal.co/s/AnonExplains) - [Diversity](https://poal.co/s/Diversity) - [FellowWhites](https://poal.co/s/FellowWhites) - [Jewess](https://poal.co/s/Jewess) - [Jewflu](https://poal.co/s/Jewflu) - [WhosePrivilege](https://poal.co/s/WhosePrivilege) - [Kikes](https://poal.co/s/Kikes) This egregious act would be comical if it weren't so chilling considering that some of these sub have **more bans than posts**... It is clear that *already* the specter of censorship is taking hold right here in one of the **VERY LAST** bastions of free-speech during a time when it is being eradicated all over the internet and all over the world. It may appear insignificant at first, but this is all it takes for Poal to become yet another dust-bowl of freedom. What are your thoughts?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (51).
[–] • 0 pt

You appear so in your prose, including lashing out at others not even in the conversation.

[–] • 0 pt

Because you are literally attacking me. I'm not going to be demure and passive. I'm not some plebbit cuck who shakes away from confrontation.

Also do you not see the irony?

You appear so in your prose, including lashing out at others not even in the conversation.

Is it not censorship (by way of prior restraint) for you to attack my prose and manner of speaking?

[–] • 0 pt

Is it not censorship (by way of prior restraint) for you to attack my prose and manner of speaking?

Of course not; I'm not stopping you from saying it. The response to my attack however is a well thought out reply.

[–] • 0 pt

Well then whatever. This is how I write. I write very aggressively. I speak the same way.

I have since I was in college and I had to deal with diverse professors who couldn't even into rules.

I will not mince words. I will always be as direct and specific as I can. Confusion is not something I like to invoke in readers or conversation partners.