WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

947

The 'truth' is an idea which defies scrutiny. Censorship is the opposite of truth; it is the promotion of lies.

It appears that the very same disease of censorship on Voat was transmitted here to Poal during the great migration. There is a sizeable group of accounts which have taken control of popular subs, and then ban the truth from coming through, thereby promoting lies and growing the disease.

It is likely that these very same accounts are controlled opposition judging by their ardent and CONSTANT projection onto others of being a jew while their ideas are questioned, at which point they are permanently banned -- akin to a child unable handle contrary thought.

In their twisted world-view, they define a sub as 'property' for which they decree to deny access, yet Poal does not belong to them, and neither does speech (do you think they own your property @AOU ?).

The link attached is a conversation between @AntiClutch and myself regarding this very same topic of censorship and ownership which ultimately led to censoring of my speech on not just that sub, but 11 others controlled by him:

This egregious act would be comical if it weren't so chilling considering that some of these sub have more bans than posts... It is clear that already the specter of censorship is taking hold right here in one of the VERY LAST bastions of free-speech during a time when it is being eradicated all over the internet and all over the world. It may appear insignificant at first, but this is all it takes for Poal to become yet another dust-bowl of freedom.

What are your thoughts?

>The *'truth'* is an idea which defies scrutiny. Censorship is the *opposite* of truth; it is the promotion of lies. It appears that the very same disease of censorship on Voat was transmitted here to Poal during the great migration. There is a sizeable group of accounts which have taken control of popular subs, and then ban the truth from coming through, thereby promoting lies and growing the disease. It is likely that these very same accounts are controlled opposition judging by their ardent and CONSTANT projection onto others of being a jew while their ideas are questioned, at which point they are permanently banned -- akin to a child unable handle contrary thought. In their twisted world-view, they define a sub as 'property' for which they decree to deny access, yet Poal does not belong to them, and neither does speech (do you think they own your property @AOU ?). The link attached is a conversation between @AntiClutch and myself regarding this very same topic of censorship and ownership which ultimately led to censoring of my speech on not *just* that sub, but 11 others controlled by him: - [MFW](https://poal.co/s/MFW) - [TFW](https://poal.co/s/TFW) - [DeathOfAmerica](https://poal.co/s/DeathOfAmerica) - [AmericaIsDead](https://poal.co/s/AmericaIsDead) - [AnonExplains](https://poal.co/s/AnonExplains) - [Diversity](https://poal.co/s/Diversity) - [FellowWhites](https://poal.co/s/FellowWhites) - [Jewess](https://poal.co/s/Jewess) - [Jewflu](https://poal.co/s/Jewflu) - [WhosePrivilege](https://poal.co/s/WhosePrivilege) - [Kikes](https://poal.co/s/Kikes) This egregious act would be comical if it weren't so chilling considering that some of these sub have **more bans than posts**... It is clear that *already* the specter of censorship is taking hold right here in one of the **VERY LAST** bastions of free-speech during a time when it is being eradicated all over the internet and all over the world. It may appear insignificant at first, but this is all it takes for Poal to become yet another dust-bowl of freedom. What are your thoughts?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

nonsense garbage about muh freeze peach
Control of speech is the #1 way in which kikes rule over the entire planet.
Free Speech CAN ONLY exist by way of restricting admins

So then you're confirming that you are against free-speech and support jews suppression of it?

4chan is a beauty of free-speech because there is almost zero censorship.
Why does that happen? Because of maximum scrutiny!

You can disagree all you want, but every idea that you have in your head got there through a battle of ideas until only the very best survived. If you valued the truth at all, you would understand this without question. I sympathize with you that free-speech platforms have been under attack, but they got their by ALLOWING censorship to take hold -- you are doing the very same thing.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

So then you're confirming that you are against free-speech

With enemies within? Yes. I am fully against total free speech on a sub by sub basis.

4chan is a beauty of free-speech because there is almost zero censorship.

IS that a joke?

4chan has tons of censorship. You may be thinking strictly of /b/.

You would be banned on 4chan if you were to go to the gaming sub and post about bicycles. So take the bullshit idea that you wouldn't elsewhere.

but they got their by ALLOWING censorship to take hold

No. They got there by allowing diverse individuals to take hold who then used censorship against the organic userbase.

Like reddit. Like digg... Like everywhere.

The idea that if I were to make a sub about Sandwich Recipes and you should be allowed to come in and post pizza recipes is fucking absurd. It's wrong. It's bad. Make your pizza recipe sub and be done with it.

I just can not understand how you think it should be acceptable for someone to do that (post pizza recipes in a sandwich recipe sub) because that is what you're arguing for. That is what you argued for with the train sub idea posted here = archive (archive.md)

Like in the United States if there were a government run group to talk about childhood obesity and you joined under false pretenses and started talking about trains: you would be banned from and removed from the group. The first amendment would not have been broken there. Not even remotely.

So please start being honest, because you've been wrong every step of the way.

e;

hole -> hold

[–] 0 pt

Then why would you abuse your power across multiple subs? Why a permanent ban?

A cursory inquiry into my comments would prove to anyone which side I'm on, so the only way you can justify it is that you didn't like my challenge.

[–] 0 pt

Why a permanent ban?

Because I'm lazy and it's easier to do the unbans myself than to select a different option.

Then why would you abuse your power across multiple subs?

Not a thing. My subs.