I think what you're seeing is demand for public fast charging is really skyrocketing
lol No it's not. This is an excuse to push for more EVs because it means limited mobility, which helps to keep people under control because of (a) limited range, (b) far greater cost of ownership, and (c) perpetual fucking surveillance of individuals' location and activities for those remaining who can afford it.
The entirety of this EV shitshow is one of several panicked reactions to the fact that Hillary the Psychopathic Hag lost to Trump in 2016.
Boo fucking hoo.
The mere connotation of non-jew Nationalism terrifies (((them))) so much that they've concocted several gimmicks to try control Whites, imagining that their idiotic schemes and desperate need for control would somehow stop what they know can't be stopped.
That's what mUh CLiMatE cRiSiS and EVs are all about.
I drive a 20-ish year old vehicle. I work on it myself most of the time and just had to put some new tires on it. I am not giving this thing up. Even if the engine blows ill probably just get a new (used) one put in so long as the rest of the body/mechanics are working well. EV's cost too much and are extremely inconvenient.
There is a reason why MOST ev owners are saying they wont buy another one and want to get rid of the one they have.
Unfortunately for them, an EV is inherently worthless.
If I could buy one cheap that has at least a 150 mile range and I could charge it at home I would consider having one as the "errand runner". Otherwise, I have no need or want for one. I don't live in the extremely concentrated east or west and things like this are just not useful for someone like me, or most of the general population that "drives" as a whole.
(post is archived)