All these words and (((your))) implied OT was to blame AI for driver error. This emotional dependence on blaming software for driver error is why foolish children play the strawman argument. Idiot child.
You did exactly what I predicted, instead of taking the olive branch I offered you simply resorted to more name-calling.
So, let me clear up one thing here. You think that " AI should not only be banded on public roads" but you're mad at me because I'm blaming the AI for human error? Do you like "high value" Tesla vehicles or do you not? You don't like autopilot in one breath and you're mad because someone else made fun of it with another. You can't even keep your argument straight, let alone mine. I never implied the AI was at fault, I said it was.
And it still is. Indirectly for the most part, since having it in the vehicle lulls people into a false sense of security. It's at fault for allowing the collision avoidance system to be disabled. The car is at fault for not having a cutoff at around 110 like other cars do. It's at fault for having a piece of shit software team that do stupid things like write logs constantly to a consumer eMMC flash card and then go "Oh, why did it fail?"
You don't think it should be banned from public roads, you don't even have an argument as to why it should or should not be used. You're mad because I called your piece of shit car a piece of shit. That's what's this whole thread comes down to, someone insulted your baby and now you're going to go full stop on them.
since having it in the vehicle lulls people into a false sense of security...
So it is operator error? But then you ignorantly blame the car once again:
The car is at fault for not having a cutoff at around 110 like other cars do.
Liar. Tesla AI has a cut off way below 90 mph, it is the fucking (((law))), you blathering retard. Once the software is hacked then it becomes an operator error. So you are blaming a big fucking lie for user error. You make idiots look intelligent. Nice trick.
You don't think it should be banned from public roads... blah, blah, (more false assumptions), blah...
Liar. I think Tesla should be investigated under a military tribunal for treason and espionage.
Ah, welcome back! I was afraid you'd left us, but it's nice to see you have returned with another round of insults. Insults prove your superiority when dealing with others.
It's ok. I know you love Tesla, otherwise you'd have never bothered replying. But let's start off once again.
The problem I'm seeing here is you keep taking each of my comments within their own context, instead of building upon them. So let's try to work this one out using what we've learned already.
So it is operator error? But then you ignorantly blame the car once again:
It's both. Please try to understand that multiple factors can come into play here.
Liar. Tesla AI has a cut off way below 90 mph
No one said AI here except you. Most cars will rev-limit their speed to around 110-120MPH.
it is the fucking (((law))), you blathering retard.
Source for this one please.
Liar. I think Tesla should be investigated under a military tribunal for treason and espionage.
No you don't. You wouldn't even bother replying if you thought that way. You're shilling for Tesla hard here.
But again, welcome back. So...I await your next round of insults. Have a safe holiday, please.
(post is archived)