Every time you've tried to refute what I said, I give you information that's shown you've not understood the material or were wrong in your assumptions. That you do not attempt to re-make those points with some sort of counterpoint shows me that you realize you made a mistake, so you have to move on to something else. Your first comment was somewhat relevant, but as we've travelled down this thread you've resorted to name-calling and just picking at semantics at the words I've chosen. Your use of the word high-perfomance car in regards to Tesla tells me that you believe they have value, and you imply that I am arguing these points because I believe the same, or believe that self-driving cars are somehow the cat's pajamas. That's your implication, and doesn't reflect my thoughts on the matter. Let's go after the only points you've actually made in this last comment of name-calling. You state: > Auto pilot on high performance cars? You really are an idiot. Tesla themselves call it autopilot, something you could have checked with a simple search. https://pic8.co/sh/ZRyWrp.png Your next point, that of: > AI should not only be banded on public roads, I agree that self-driving cars aren't there yet. There's too many variables, and it's, in my opinion, going to need to be a road where only automatically driven cars are allowed. Mixing human and automatics together without many interlocking failsafes is just going to result in what we saw during this event, where autopilot kicks off but the wetware doesn't kick on. I really don't know what you're getting at here. You seem to think that Tesla is some great thing, but you hate them at the same time? I fully expect you to simply call me more names here and find something else to pick at, but I am interested in why you think AI should be banned from public roads, and I believe this is a good talking point. But, if history serves me correct, you'll ignore that offering and just insult me again.