Every time you've tried to refute what I said, I give you information that's shown you've not understood the material or were wrong in your assumptions. That you do not attempt to re-make those points with some sort of counterpoint shows me that you realize you made a mistake, so you have to move on to something else. Your first comment was somewhat relevant, but as we've travelled down this thread you've resorted to name-calling and just picking at semantics at the words I've chosen.
Your use of the word high-perfomance car in regards to Tesla tells me that you believe they have value, and you imply that I am arguing these points because I believe the same, or believe that self-driving cars are somehow the cat's pajamas. That's your implication, and doesn't reflect my thoughts on the matter.
Let's go after the only points you've actually made in this last comment of name-calling. You state:
Auto pilot on high performance cars? You really are an idiot.
Tesla themselves call it autopilot, something you could have checked with a simple search.
Your next point, that of:
AI should not only be banded on public roads,
I agree that self-driving cars aren't there yet. There's too many variables, and it's, in my opinion, going to need to be a road where only automatically driven cars are allowed. Mixing human and automatics together without many interlocking failsafes is just going to result in what we saw during this event, where autopilot kicks off but the wetware doesn't kick on.
I really don't know what you're getting at here. You seem to think that Tesla is some great thing, but you hate them at the same time? I fully expect you to simply call me more names here and find something else to pick at, but I am interested in why you think AI should be banned from public roads, and I believe this is a good talking point. But, if history serves me correct, you'll ignore that offering and just insult me again.
All these words and (((your))) implied OT was to blame AI for driver error. This emotional dependence on blaming software for driver error is why foolish children play the strawman argument. Idiot child.
You did exactly what I predicted, instead of taking the olive branch I offered you simply resorted to more name-calling.
So, let me clear up one thing here. You think that " AI should not only be banded on public roads" but you're mad at me because I'm blaming the AI for human error? Do you like "high value" Tesla vehicles or do you not? You don't like autopilot in one breath and you're mad because someone else made fun of it with another. You can't even keep your argument straight, let alone mine. I never implied the AI was at fault, I said it was.
And it still is. Indirectly for the most part, since having it in the vehicle lulls people into a false sense of security. It's at fault for allowing the collision avoidance system to be disabled. The car is at fault for not having a cutoff at around 110 like other cars do. It's at fault for having a piece of shit software team that do stupid things like write logs constantly to a consumer eMMC flash card and then go "Oh, why did it fail?"
You don't think it should be banned from public roads, you don't even have an argument as to why it should or should not be used. You're mad because I called your piece of shit car a piece of shit. That's what's this whole thread comes down to, someone insulted your baby and now you're going to go full stop on them.
since having it in the vehicle lulls people into a false sense of security...
So it is operator error? But then you ignorantly blame the car once again:
The car is at fault for not having a cutoff at around 110 like other cars do.
Liar. Tesla AI has a cut off way below 90 mph, it is the fucking (((law))), you blathering retard. Once the software is hacked then it becomes an operator error. So you are blaming a big fucking lie for user error. You make idiots look intelligent. Nice trick.
You don't think it should be banned from public roads... blah, blah, (more false assumptions), blah...
Liar. I think Tesla should be investigated under a military tribunal for treason and espionage.
(post is archived)